York University Redefine the possible.
space Prospective students Current students Faculty & staff Alumni Visitors York crest
rule
   

Ananya Mukherjee Reed

Some of  the doctoral and masters projects I am involved with (or have been in the recent past)  

 

Dr.Jasper Ayelazuno, Ph.d 2011; Post-doctoral fellow, International Secretariat for Human Development (ISHD)
I was born to a peasant family in the poorest part of Ghana (northern Ghana, specifically Upper East Region), and was the first in my family to sit in a classroom. I was a police officer in Ghana for ten years, worked with the UN peacekeeping missions in Bosnia and Kosovo for a year each; I also had a stint as an Investigator with the Ghana National Reconciliation Commission, set up in 2002 to investigate human rights abuses by former military regimes in Ghana.  For my MA, I went to the Institute of Development Studies at Sussex, from where I graduated with Distinction. My doctoral dissertation tries to understand the puzzling political behaviour, and the broader questions about the nature of agency of subaltern classes in Ghana at this historical conjuncture of neo-liberal globalization. The 'subaltern(s)' in Ghana have consistently voted to power the two parties that have embraced and implemented the austerity and free market policies of the IMF/World Bank. This, despite the fact that these free market policies have led to the deterioration of the material and social living conditions of the majority. Thus what is conceptualised in this study (following Hannah Arendt) as the social question is left unresolved in Ghana, just as it is in most countries in the global South (and even in the global North, for those at the lower echelons of these societies). The paradoxical behaviour of the subalterns in Ghana is not a rarity in Africa, and even beyond. For example, the ANC has since the end of Apartheid in South Africa won all the presidential elections in that country, despite what many see as its betrayal of the dreams of the anti-apartheid struggle. Yet there is a plethora of literature telling us that the subaltern classes are resisting neoliberalism. How do we understand the paradoxical behaviour of the subalterns in Ghana, and beyond? For example, why did the subalterns in my village and one other neighbouring village fight over the name of the only clinic in the area rather mobilising collectively to resist the introduction of health user-fees (“cash-and-carry”) in Ghana? Why do they resist certain injustices sometimes and endure others most of the time? What accounts for the different political actions of the subalterns in Ghana and Bolivia in the wake of neo-liberalism? My underlying proposition is that, the political agency of the subalterns is contingent on social contextual and historical variables.

 

 

Bikrum Gill, Ph.d II
Master Research paper title: Agrarian Crisis in India : Processes of “Accumulation by Dispossession”  
Working through David Harvey’s theory of the ‘new’ imperialism, one that identifies processes of ‘accumulation by dispossession’ as the central constituting element of contemporary imperialism, my masters research paper attempts to explore and elucidate the links between the new imperialism, neo-liberal economic reforms, and the deepening agrarian crisis in India.  I first argue that the premise for such an exploration can be found in the central role that the social (dis)organization of agrarian relations in the South have historically played in the struggle between imperialist and anti-imperialist forces.  Central to the anti-colonial struggle in India were questions of land reform and food self-sufficiency that sought to overturn the regressive property regimes and gross misuse of agricultural resources that were constitutive of colonial rule.  While the national developmental state that was born out of the anti-colonial struggle was beset by various contradictions, primary agricultural producers were nonetheless able to secure significant social protections through publicly managed institutions.  I argue that India’s much celebrated structural adjustment from developmental state to neo-liberal state has in practice provided policy mechanisms – namely privatization, financialization, state withdrawal, liberalized trade – that have allowed multinational and domestic agribusiness corporations  to engage in predatory forms of ‘primitive’ accumulation through dispossessing agrarian communities of control over knowledge (through the intellectual property rights regime), resources, and public institutions which are integral to their security of livelihood. 

       

Jacqueline Medalye

Dissertation topic: International Political Economy of Climate Change Adaptation
My research interests are in global environmental politics.  Specifically, I am interested in examining the political and social challenges adaptation to climate change will present to the international community. I hope to model the social and political variables involved in adaptation policy using a critical theoretical framework.  I would like to study the political economy of adaptation with a focus on comparing countries with the same vulnerabilities to climate change but varying levels of human development.  In doing so, I hope that my research will address the social and political inequalities climate change adaptation presents to the international system. I aspire that this research can contribute to our understanding of the political economic dimensions of climate change policy in order to improve planning at the international and national level.                   




Dr. Sarah Macharia, Ph.d 2008
Dissertation title: The urban ‘informal economy’ in the Global South: A feminist postempiricist study of policy discourse in sub-Saharan Africa with a special focus on streetvending in Kenya
I apply a policy analysis framework that underscores the systematic interrogation of policy discourse that more often than not remains unproblematized in conventional policy analysis. Informed by a comparative case study of Nairobi and Durban City, I explore the gendered impact of different forms of policy discourse on the ‘informal’ economy. Are there gender disparities among informal workers in interpreting policy statements and action? Are policy makers’ agendas skewed towards certain gender interests over others? In the rigidly neoliberal governance context that is characteristic of most of sub-Saharan Africa, how can the gendering of work and workers intensified by mainstream economic policy be disrupted and radically altered? Which policy processes should those working in feminized occupations in the informal economy and particularly women target in order to catalyze and benefit from supportive state policy in their own right as workers?

 

Sadia Naz, Ph.d II, Carleton University
I completed by MA at York and began my doctoral work at Carleton in Fall 2006. 
My Masters research paper (Post 9/11: Exploring Conflicts in the Global World) was a critique of  some of the major arguments that seek to explain conflicts (e.g., religion, poverty, exclusion, underdevelopment, and grievance). It argued that conflicts should be seen as an outcome of   globalization, the ‘war on terror’ and the ‘anti-poverty’ agenda that has emerged in the aftermath of  9/11, rather than of  'local' and 'national' failures.   My doctoral work is an extension of my interest in economic globalization and emerging patterns of power within Third World, in particular Pakistan and Bangladesh.  Pakistan is under military rule and Bangladesh is being governed by a democratically elected government. In both cases, there is not only an increased collusion between civil and military fractions of the governing elites (among political leadership and the military) but also resulted in fundamental transformations in the roles of both civil and military governments.  I propose to study this newly emerging dynamics of local governance and resistance in Pakistan and Bangladesh.  


Denise Roman, Ph. D., 2002; Research Scholar, Center for the Study of Women, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and the European Editor of the feminist journal Women's Studies International Forum
My dissertation was titled Alterity and Identity: Nation, Gender, and Popular Culture in Post-Communist Romania (Post-Communist Cultural Studies). Located at the intersection of a politics of globalization, post-communism, and Eastern European transformation, the dissertation surveyed the particularity of identity construction in the region, focusing on different (yet connected) axes: nation and ethnicity, gender, queer, youth, popular culture, and new consumption patterns in post-communist Romania. The new domain suggested in the dissertation, “Post-Communist Cultural Studies” (PCCS), responded to a new sensibility in Western social sciences and humanities, a sensibility gained after important decades of civil rights, feminist, queer, and post-colonial movements--all of which have struggled to make their positionality, (sub)culture, or subjectivity visible and politically accepted. From an analytical standpoint, PCCS determines new, dynamic, and historicized ways of analyzing subjectivities previously conceived as essentialist identities. At the same time, from a teleological perspective and in light of its transnational character, PCCS enables the study of new, globalizing political identities, while empowering local subjectivities to voice the specificity of their culture, politics, and society within an increasingly pluralistic, global-local international community. In a slightly modified version, the dissertation was published as Fragmented Identities: Popular Culture, Sex, and Everyday Life in Postcommunist Romania, (Lexington Books/Rowman & Littlefield, 2003). It is soon to be published in paperback. See the book's blog here.

A few authors about Fragmented Identities:

Debra Renee Kaufman, Matthews Distinguished Professor of Sociology at Northeastern University, and author of Rachel's Daughters 'Ms. Roman . . . has written not only an outstanding piece of academic scholarship, but a real 'page turner.'

Catherine Durandin, The National Institute of Oriental Languages and Literatures, Paris
Denise Roman's . . . book should be read as a kind of 'flânerie', expressing the feel of everyday . . . life in post-1989 Romania.

Charles King, Associate Professor of Foreign Service and Government, and holder of the Ion Ratiu Chair of Romanian Studies, Georgetown University, '[Roman's] walk through . . . one country’s postcommunist experience [is] a smart and often funny example of cultural theory in action'.

Gordana Rabrenovic, Associate Director, Brudnick Center on Violence and Conflict Northeastern University, Boston, "Denise Roman takes us to an exciting journey through . . . [the] changes Eastern European societies underwent as they emerged from communism.'




Carlos Torchia
Dissertation title : The Incomplete Democratic Consolidation in Chile: What Have the Poor Gained? In this dissertation I critically examine the nature of  the 'low intensity' democracy achieved by the Chilean people since the inauguration of the first post-Pinochet civilian government in 1991. I attempt to answer the following research questions:  Are the Chilean poor better off fifteen years after the end of the military regime? Has “political freedom” brought “development” to the marginal and oppressed? What is the meaning that the Chilean poor ascribe to the notion of 'development'? If we take development to mean the empowerment of collective agents to transform their social and political reality, then how do we interpret contemporary Chilean reality?  Does the “growth with equity” strategy of the current governing coalition have the capacity to reduce poverty in Chile in a significant manner? 

 

Tina Virmani

Research Interests: postcolonial, feminist and gender studies, political economy, nationalism and identity, the politics of knowledge production, particularly in relation to the fields of gender and development and women’s human rights and feminist knowledge production in India, and the production of consent/complicity to regimes of power. For my dissertation the question I would like to explore is: under what conditions and for what purposes is feminist knowledge produced in different national and regional contexts? The research will examine the social relations that affect and inform the use of certain epistemologies and pedagogical practices, the major debates engaged with, the extent and nature of connections to local social movements and NGOs, and the transnational connections that are maintained. Asking questions about how feminist scholars and students see themselves as contributing to social change, an important goal will be to further understandings of the role of universities as a site of both the production of knowledge as well as of subjectivities. Furthermore, keeping in mind feminist critiques of: 1) representation of “third world women” as victims of traditional patriarchal systems and 2) the tokenized approach of incorporating scholarship about women from the global South into curriculum in the North, the project will aim to locate possibilities for trans-border connections that go beyond liberal pluralist models of accommodating or including different voices.

 

Dr. Zubairu Wai,  Ph.d 2010
Research interests: Politics of knowledge production on Africa; comparative politics of social transformation: development, globalization and democracy in the Global South; and discourses of violence, identity and conflicts in Africa.
Dissertation title: The Politics of Knowledge Production and Discourse of Violence on Civil Wars: Sierra Leone as a Challenge to the Dominant Representations of African Conflicts. My dissertation addresses the problematique of knowledge production about contemporary African conflicts and seeks to assess the impact of such knowledges on African societies. Though Africa is a major site for the production of knowledge about contemporary conflicts, there remains a significant lacuna in the way these conflicts are interpreted, theorised and understood. Most studies on African conflict remain severely flawed in that they focus only on issues of theories and methods, but avoid the more fundamental questions of epistemology. My aim is to construct such an epistemological enquiry and then, propose an alternative epistemology for understanding African conflicts. Using the civil war in Sierra Leone as my empirical case, my dissertation seeks to investigate (a) what is included and what is left out in the production of knowledge about conflicts in Africa; (b) the epistemological foundations of the dominant approaches to these conflicts; the power relations in which they are embedded; the particular interpretive dispositions they foreground and those they foreclose; and (c) how these produced knowledges affect the articulation of  policy towards Africa. By focusing on knowledge production, my research addresses a major lacuna in the literature on African conflicts, and holds signifiicant implications for understanding the dynamics of contemporary conflicts on and beyond the continent.

back to my home page


Last updated: February 13, 2012