|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- Canada has more than 33 million people
- The birth rate is low, and falling
- Except among aboriginal peoples
- Population grows now mainly through immigration
- From global and increasingly non-European sources
- Immigrant fertility props up the birth rate
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Changes in Canada’s economy drive internal migration, and shift
population growth
- Growth connected to resource sector especially of energy resources
- Decline of manufacturing jobs
- Population and employment shifts westwards to BC, Prairies.
|
|
6
|
- Canada’s population is growing rapidly older
- Thanks to decades of declining fertility and improvements in sanitation,
health
- Growth of significant ‘old-age’ dependency
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
- Canada 1867:
- Canada 2010:
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
- Growth comes from three direct sources:
- Natural increase (more births than deaths)
- Immigration (more arrive than leave)
- Territorial expansion (eg 360,000 Newfoundlanders join Canada in 1949).
|
|
13
|
- Economic growth and opportunity is most important:
- Attracts migrants, especially young adults who then boost the birth
rate
|
|
14
|
- Where do people live?
- What kinds of settlements?
|
|
15
|
- Population Density
- People per unit of territory
- Usually people/km2
- Canada 2010:
- 33.311 Million people
- 9.2 Million km2 of land area
- 3.6 people/km2
|
|
16
|
- Population/km2 is known as crude density
- Not all the land is easy to live in
- Other measures possible:
- Population per unit of farmland
- Only 11% of Canada can be farmed
- Only 5% can produce crops
|
|
17
|
- Canada is thinly populated overall but
- More densely populated when it comes to feeding people
- People per km2 of cropland
- Canada: 72
- Netherlands: 1829
|
|
18
|
- Within Canada
- 13.4 people/km2 in Ontario
- Much higher in south, lower in north
- 0.03 people/km2 in NWT/Yukon/Nunavut
|
|
19
|
- Recognizes that not all of Canada is thickly inhabited
- Much is almost uninhabited
- Ecumene:
- The part of Canada where 99% of the people live
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- 60% of the population lives in the Great Lakes-St Lawrence Lowlands
- 19 million people, 75% of the major cities
- Manufacturing, intensive commercial farming
- Biggest City: Toronto 5 million
|
|
22
|
- Contains 1/3 of population, 12 million people
- Extends to the edge of the agricultural area beyond the population core
- Biggest city: Vancouver 2.1 million
|
|
23
|
- Boreal forest
- Contains 1% of the population
- No major population centres, but there are resource towns
- Biggest city: Fort McMurray 52,000 pop
|
|
24
|
- Northern belts of boreal forest to the tundra
- Less than 1% of the population\Isolated centres
- Biggest City: Labrador City 7200 pop
|
|
25
|
- Canada is a highly urbanized society
- 80% live in urban areas
- And most urban people live in large cities
- Canada became majority urban in the 1920s
- Ontario, Quebec, BC became majority-urban first
- West, Maritimes became majority urban only circa 1960
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Natural Increase
- Until 1986 most of Canada’s population growth came from births
exceeding deaths
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- People used to have large families
|
|
30
|
- Traditionally death rates for young children were high
- So a high birth rate compensated for this
- High child death rates were due to
- Infectious disease
- Polluted drinking water
|
|
31
|
- The public water supply was unsafe to drink
- No sewage treatment, no treatment of drinking water
- Waterborne diseases prevalent
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Need to
- Treat drinking water, sewage
- Improve childhood vaccinations
- Protect food supplies, especially milk
- Basic sanitation measures
- With these in place, mortality drops
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- With improved rates of child survival having lots of babies gets
expensive
- Easier to have high material living standards with a smaller family
- Improvements in the status of women
- More complex than the mortality transition
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
- The number of births the average woman expects in her lifetime
- A Total Fertility Rate of 2.1
- Means births match deaths
- In 1961 TFR was 3.8 in Canada
- At the height of the baby boom
- In 2007 TFR was 1.6 in Canada
|
|
45
|
- Because most immigrants arrive as young adults
- And will start families soon
- High levels of immigration tend to boost the birthrate
- So without immigration, Canada’s TFR would be even lower.
|
|
46
|
- Big changes in the economy change human demographics
- There have been 3 main ‘transitions”
- Development of hunting
- Development of farming
- Development of industry
- We are still living through this global transition
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- Balance of ages and sexes in a population
- It varies over time and place
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
- Population pyramids over time
|
|
52
|
- Bears the marks of population history
- Carries implications for population future
- Is dynamic over time and space
- Conditions the needs of the population
- Canada and Russia both have an aging population
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
- Baby boomers approaching retirement
- may not get much Canada pension
- may outlive RRSPs and other savings
- may bust the health care system
- Ontario faces worker shortages
- birth-rate too small
- migration not replacing retirements
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
- If you can’t get into teacher’s college
- Become a funeral director
- Train at Humber College
- Possibility of on-line sales
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
- Canada has a long history of significant immigration
- Actual peak year for immigration was 1912-13
- Since 1950 sustained high levels of immigration
- Relatively unusual among advanced industrial economies
- Our low birth rate, age structure justify significant immigration
|
|
66
|
- 13 million immigrants to Canada in C20th
- Arrivals peak in 1910s
- population was still small
- West was settling,
- Immigration spikes with short term-economic booms
- Slowdown in the 1920s-1930s
|
|
67
|
- Renewed immigration post 1945
- Sustained economic boom
- Canadian wages slightly higher than US
- Immigration broadens 1960s onwards
- Highest sustained immigration in 1990s: 2.2 million
|
|
68
|
|
|
69
|
- Pre 1940s
- Britain & Ireland, NW Europe
- Some SE, E Europe
- Severe restrictions on immigration from Asia: Head Tax etc.,
|
|
70
|
- Post 1945:
- Rise in SE Europeans, Italy, Greece
- Increase in Asian immigration
- Immigration Reforms 1960s
- Asian immigration increases
- Greatest diversity of immigrant origins
|
|
71
|
- Early C20th:
- Most immigrants went to farming districts: the West
- Mid C20th and later
- Most immigrants head for the cities
- Canada an urban economy
- Cities develop huge immigrant populations
|
|
72
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
74
|
- Toronto: 44% are immigrants
- Vancouver: 38% are immigrants
- And many more are children, descendents of immigrants
- Some cities have few immigrants
- Some cities have few recent immigrants
- Hamilton: 23% immigrants, only 5% in past 5 years
|
|
75
|
- Tend to be young adults
- And therefore tend to be fertile
- Tend to be better educated than the general population
- Most have adequate language skills, but some do not
- Tend to become English speakers
|
|
76
|
- New vs Old Canadians (immigration)
- Aboriginal vs non-aboriginal
- French vs English
- Urban vs Rural
- Centralist vs decentralist
|
|
77
|
- Are evolving
- Produce new combinations
- Growth of urban aboriginal populations
- Decline in Francophones outside Quebec
- Immigration adding to urban populations
- Growth of cities outside central Canada
|
|
78
|
- Old idea that an immigrant arrives and gradually turns into a mainstream
Canadian
- Or at least the next generation does
- Does not seem to be happening to some
recent visible minority immigrants
- Difficulties in getting jobs suited to qualifications
|
|
79
|
- Despite not having immigrated, aboriginals do not function as ‘old
Canadians’
- Slow to receive the benefits of Canadian society
- Suffered from attempts at assimilation
- Strong tendency to seek enhanced distinctiveness
|
|
80
|
- Given a segregated existence in C19th-C20th
- Reserves
- Deprived of Canadian civil rights until 1959
- Assimilation a goal 1870s-1970s
- Residential schools damage cultural integrity
|
|
81
|
- Granted the federal vote only in 1959
- Controlled their band funds only from 1958
- Gradual acceptance of land claims
- 400 settled 1970-2009
- 855 to go
- Trend towards Aboriginal people gaining greater community autonomy,
self-government
- Runs counter to ‘assimilation’
|
|
82
|
- Increasingly immigration comes from global sources
- Especially the population giants of China, and Indian subcontinent
- Population growing faster from immigration than from fertility
- Has huge cultural implications
|
|
83
|
- Will change Canadian culture
- May aid liberalisation, tolerance, cultural pluralism
- Add to the cultural richness
- Give us interesting restaurants
|
|
84
|
- May nurture cultural conflict, cultural territoriality
- Power of traditional elites, charter groups bound to be challenged
- ‘un-Canadian’ values may be imported
- Is this a problem?
|
|
85
|
- Will eventually challenge that English-French faultline
- Canadian culture beginning to wear a multicultural face
|
|
86
|
- Tends to flow to certain major cities, and some provinces
- Ontario, Quebec, BC, Alberta
- Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary
- Reflects economic opportunity, immigrant contact networks
- 95% of new immigrants live in large urban centres
|
|
87
|
- Major urban centres develop ethnic communities, enclaves
- But increasingly these are shifting to the suburbs
|
|
88
|
|
|
89
|
- Growing rapidly compared to the rest of Canada
- Thanks mainly to fertility
- 500,000 aboriginals in Canada c. 1492
- Population had crashed to 106,000 1911
- Population surge from late 1940s
- 220,000 by 1961
- 1,320,000 in 2001
- In 1990s Saskatchewan was on track to become a majority-aboriginal
province
|
|
90
|
- Younger and more fertile than the majority of Canadians
|
|
91
|
|
|
92
|
- For most industrial societies modernity brought a demographic transition
- Mortality drops first, followed by fertility
- For aboriginal societies, encounter with “modernity” was painful
- Disruption of aboriginal culture, economy boosted mortality, weakened
fertility
- Signs of improvement now
|
|
93
|
- Over the longer term, assimilation is an issue
- Aboriginal people mix with other folk
- Legal and cultural identification of “aboriginal” will gradually apply
to fewer people
- Some groups have already lost their language
|
|
94
|
- Historically, French was only spoken in some parts of Canada, and among
some segments of the population
- Quebec, eastern New Brunswick, northern & eastern Ontario
- But French-speaking areas had English-speaking minorities
- Eastern townships of Quebec
- West island of Montreal
- English was more widespread
|
|
95
|
- The traditional duality of Canadian culture
- “Two nations warring in the bosom of a single state”
- Survival of French language, French culture has been a touchy issue in
Canadian political history
|
|
96
|
- French given special status to help preserve it
- One of Canada’s two official languages
- Used in federal services, nationally
- Bilingualism required in for military officers
- French the official language of Quebec
- Provinces encouraged to establish/preserve French language rights
|
|
97
|
- Immigration brings in people who can speak one official language or
another
- But many who speak neither
- The touchy issue of what language they should learn
- You can only send your kids to school in English in Quebec if you
attended English-speaking schools in Quebec
- All others are schooled in French
|
|
98
|
- Ontario has significant French-speaking population
- Eastern Ontario, Ottawa Valley
- Northern Ontario (Sudbury, North Bay, Chapleau)
- Several French-speaking colleges and universities
- But Ontario has many more immigrant ‘ethnics’
- Far more Chinese than French-speakers
- It will soon be easier to run “Chinese immersion” schooling than French
immersion
|
|
99
|
- French speakers more likely to pick up English than the other way round
- English-speaking universities in Quebec always have strong enrollment
- Declining percentage of French speakers outside Quebec
- Declining percentage of English speakers within Quebec
|
|
100
|
- A political issue which could lead to Canada’s breakup
- Quebec a distinct society
|
|
101
|
- Gradual population shifts towards economic opportunity
- Maritimes and Atlantic Canada lose population to Central and Western
Canada
- Western Canada grows fastest
- Picks up migrants from central Canada, the East
|
|
102
|
- Shift of population signals an eventual shift of political power
- From central and Eastern Canada to the west
- Already we see a shift of economic power
|
|
103
|
- Liberals generally choose a leader from Ontario or Quebec
- But have lost almost all their voting support in the non-urban West
- A party declining with its dwindling political core?
|
|
104
|
- Conservatives trade on western resentment of central Canada
- Like the Reform Party before them
- Strong in west, weaker in Ontario & Quebec
|
|
105
|
- Politics continues to work unevenly over geographic space
|
|
106
|
- Population shifts leave Canada in political limbo
- Old-style dominance by central Canada is fading
- Emerging strength of the west is insufficient to produce majority
government
|
|
107
|
- We have already mentioned the historic growth of Canada’s urban
populations
- What about population patterns within cities?
|
|
108
|
- Historically the wealthier people abandoned the inner city for the
suburbs
- Poor, immigrant ethnics moved into the cheap inner-city areas
- Poverty had an inner-city face
|
|
109
|
- Since 1970 a tendency in many Canadian cities for middle and
upper-income people to move back into the inner city
- Still remain in some suburban areas
- Poor, immigrant ethnics moved to the suburbs
- Toronto has a “white” core, with a visible-minority suburban collar
|
|
110
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
112
|
- Noted that poverty in Toronto has a new geography after 1970
- Poverty is increasingly suburban
- Divides the city into three zones:
|
|
113
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
115
|
- Previously we questioned Bone’s faultlines
- There might be others we could add
- One candidate may be this inner city vs suburban ‘faultline’
- Makes immigrant “assimilation” issues much more difficult
- Perhaps a consequence of Ontario’s relative economic decline?
|