THEORIES OF CRIME AND DEVIANCE
[[ANALYTIC STIPULATION: WHEN
SOCIOLOGISTS STUDY CRIME AND DEVIANCE, THEY ATTEMPT TO LEARN WHAT TYPES OF BEHAVIOR ARE DEFINED AS DEVIANT, WHO DOES
THE DEFINING, HOW AND WHY PEOPLE BECOME DEVIANTS, AND HOW SOCIETY DEALS WITH
DEVIANCE è
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SYSTEM IS ONLY ONE RESPONSE TO DEVIANCE è IT IS ONE OF A RANGE OF FORMAL RESPONSES THAT WE HAVE COME TO RELY UPON TO
GUARD AGAINST CERTAIN FORMS OF UNWANTED CONDUCT]]
LET’S LOOK AT SEVERAL "EXPLANATORY THEORIES" OF CRIME AND DEVIANCE è WHILE EACH FOCUSES ON THE
ROLE OF SOCIAL GROUPS IN CREATING DEVIANCE, THESE THEORIES ARE QUITE DIFFERENT FROM ONE ANOTHER è HOWEVER, EACH CONTRIBUTES IN
ITS OWN WAY TO OUR UNDERSTANDING OF DEVIANCE è NONE OFFER A COMPREHENSIVE EXPLANATION OF ALL DEVIANCE, BUT, IN MANY
RESPECTS THEY CAN BE CONSIDERED COMPLIMENTARY {{KENDALL PP. 200}}
STRAIN
THEORY
(FUNCTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE):
ACCORDING TO "STRAIN
THEORY," PEOPLE FEEL STRAIN WHEN THEY ARE EXPOSED TO CULTURAL GOALS
THAT THEY ARE UNABLE TO OBTAIN BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE
ACCESS TO CULTURALLY APPROVED MEANS OF ACHIEVING THOSE GOALS.
ACCORDING TO ROBERT
MERTON (1938 1968), IN A SMOOTHLY FUNCTIONING SOCIETY, DEVIANCE WILL BE LIMITED
BECAUSE MOST PEOPLE SHARE COMMON CULTURAL GOALS AND A DEGREE UPON THE
APPROPRIATE MEANS FOR REACHING THEM è HOWEVER, SOCIETIES THAT DO NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT AVENUES TO
REACH THESE GOALS MAY ALSO LACK AGREEMENT ABOUT THE APPROPRIATE MEANS BY WHICH PEOPLE MAT ACHIEVE THEIR ASPIRATIONS è DEVIANCE MAY BE COMMON IN SUCH SOCIETIES
BECAUSE PEOPLE MAY BE WILLING TO USE WHATEVER MEANS THEY CAN TO ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS.
THE GOALS MAY BE MATERIAL POSSESSIONS AND MONEY; THE APPROVED MEANS MAY INCLUDE AN EDUCATION AND JOBS. WHEN DENIED LEGITIMATE
ACCESS TO THESE GOALS, SOME PEOPLE SEEK ACCESS THROUGH DEVIANT MEANS.
EX: MARGARET BEARE
(1996A) HAS USED MERTON’S STRAIN THEORY TO EXPLAIN THE INVOLVEMENT OF
CANADIAN MOHAWKS IN THE ORGANIZED CRIME OF SMUGGLING IN THE EARLY 1990S è IN ORDER TO RAISE REVENUE AND TO DISCOURAGE SMOKING,
CANADIAN GOVERNMENTS HAS FOR DECADES IMPOSED HIGH TAXES ON CIGARETTES è AS A RESULT, THE COSET OF
CIGARETS HAD BECOME MUCH HIGHER IN THIS COUNTRY THAN IN THE USA è TO SAVE MONEY, MANY OF THOSE
ADDICTED TO CIGARETTES TURNED TO THE "CONTRABAND MARKET" è BY 1993, MORE THAN ONE-QUARTER OF THE CIGARETTES
CONSUMED IN CANADA WERE PURCHASED ILLEGALLY è IN ONTARIO AND QUEBEC, RESIDENTS OF SOME FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITIES WERE AMONG
THE MAJOR SOURCES OF THESE CONTRABAND CIGARETTES.
BECAUSE OF HIGH
UNEMPLOYMENT AND LACK OF LEGITIMATE OPPORTUNITIES IN MOST FIRST NATIONS
COMMUNITIES, DEVIANCE HAD BECOME AN ATTRACTIVE OPTION è SMUGGLING BECAME A MEANS OF
ACHIEVING THE GOAL OF FINANCIAL SUCCESS.
[[FACTORS è CIGARETTE MANUFACTURERS WERE
EAGER TO SHIP CANADIAN BRANDS INTO THE USA KNOWING THAT THEY WOULD BE SMUGGLED
BACK è THE LOCATION OF SOME
RESERVES WAS IDEAL {THE MOHAWK RESERVE AT KAKWESASNE, FOR EXAMPLE, STRADDLED
THE ONTARIO-QUEBEC AND CANADA-US BORDERS è FIRST NATION PEOPLE CAN PURCHASE FOR PERSONAL USE UNLIMITED
AMOUNTS OF TAX-FREE TOBACCO IN USA è JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES OVER LAW ENFORCEMENT REDUCED THE ABILITY
OF THE POLICE TO WORK EFFECTIVELYè IN BEARE’S OPINION – THE
SMUGGLING WAS ALSO FACILITATED BY FEELINGS OF INJUSTICE AGAINST THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS ON
THE PART OF THE MOHAWKS, WHICH SOME FELT JUSTIFIED THEIR DEVIANCE]]].
SOME
SOCIOLOGISTS FEEL THAT STRAIN THEORY CAN HELP EXPLAIN UPPER-CLASS DEVIANCE
AS WELL è EX: PRESSURE TO INCREASE
CORPORATE PROFITS MAY LEAD EXECUTIVES TO TURN TO ILLEGAL WAYS OF DOING BUSINESS è COMPANY DOCUMENTS SUGGEST
THAT THE PRESIDENT OF IMPERIAL TOBACCO KNOINGLY SUPPLIED TOBACCO TO SMUGGLERS
==
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT FILED A $1 BILLION LAWSUIT AGAINST RJR-MACDONALD CANADA AND THE CANADIAN TOBACCO
MANUFACTURERS COUNCIL BECAUSE OF THEIR ALLEGED INVOLVEMENT IN SIMILAR
ACTIVITIES è IN FEBRARY 2003, CRIMINAL
CHARGES WERE FILED AGAINST RJR MACDONALD CANADA AND SEVERAL OF ITS SENIOR
EXECUTIVES è THESE COMPANIES WERE
MOTIVATED BY THEIR DESIRE TO MAINTAIN THEIR MARKET SHARE BY ENSURING THAT THEIR
CIGARETTES WERE THE ONES SMUGGLED BACK INTO CANADA AND BY THEIR DESIRE TO UNDERMINE
THE GOVERNMENT’S POLICY OF REDUCING TOBACCO USE BY INCREASING THE PRICE OF
CIGARETTES.
OPPORTUNITY THEORY: ACCESS TO ILLEGITIMATE
OPPORTUNITIES
[EXPANDING ON
MERTON’S THEORY, SOCIOLOGISTS RICHARD CLOWARD AND LLOYD OHLIN (1960) HAVE
SUGGESTED THAT FOR DEVIANCE TO OCCUR PEOPLE MUST HAVE ACCESS TO ILLEGITIMATE
OPPORTUNITY STRICTURES – CIRCUMSTANCES
THAT PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO ACQUIRE
THROUGH ILLEGITIMATE ACTIVITIES WHAT THEY CANNOT GET THROUGH LEGITIMATE CHANNELS.
EX: MEMBERS OF SOME
COMMUNITIES MAY HAVE INSUFFICIENT LEGITIMATE MEANS TO ACHIEVE CONVENTIONAL GOALS
OF STATUS AND WEALTH BUT HAVE MUCH GREATER ACCESS TO ILLEGITIMATE OPPORTUNITY
STRUCTURES – SUCH AS THEFT, DRUG DEALING, OR ROBBERY – THROUGH WHICH THEY CAN
ACHIEVE THESE GOALS == THE SITUATION AT AKWESANNE PROVIDED A VERY
LUCRATIVE OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURE FOR THE MINORITY OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS WHO CHOSE
TO USE IT.
ACCORDING TO
COLOWARD AND OHLIN – THREE DIFFERENT FORMS OF "DELINQUENT
SUBCULTURES" – CRIMINAL, CONFLICT, AND RETREATIST – EMERGE BASED ON THE TYPE
OF ILLEGITIMATE OPPORTUNITIES AVAILABLE IN A SPECIFIC AREA == {1} THE CRIMINAL
SUBCULTURE FOCUS ON ECONOMIC GAIN AND INCLUDE SUCH ACTS AS THEFT,
EXTORTION, AND DRUG DEALING == {SOCIOLOGIST ELIJAH ANDERSON (1990) SUGGESTED
THAT THE "DRUG ECONOMY IS AN EMPLOYMENTY AGENCY SUPERIMPOSED ON THE
EXISTING GANG NETWORK" FOR MANY YOUNG MEN WHO LACK OTHER OPPORTUNITIES.
FOR YOUNG MEN WHO GROW UP IN A GANG SUBCULTURE, RUNNING DRUG HOUSES AND SELLING DRUGS ON THE STREET
CORNERS BECOMES A SOURCE OF ILLEGITIMATE OPPORTUNITY. USING THE MONEY FROM THESE
"JOBS," THEY CAN SUPPORT THEMSELVES AND THEIR FAMILIES AS WELL AS PURCHASE MATERIAL
POSSESSIONS TO IMPRESS OTHERS.
== {2} WHEN
ILLEGITIMATE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE, GANGS MAY BECOME CONFLICT
SUBCULTURES THAT FIGHT OVER TURF (TERRITORY) AND ADOPT A VALUE SYSTEM OF
TOUGHNESS, COURAGE, AND SIMILAR STATUS-ENHANCING QUALITIES.
== {3} THOSE WHO
LACK THE OPPORTUNITY OR ABILITY TO JOIN ONE OF THESE GANGS MAY TURN TO RETREATIST
FORMS OF DEVIANCE SUCH AS DRINKING AND DRUG USE.
CONTROL
THEORY: SOCIAL BONDING
LIKE STRAIN THEORY,
SOCIAL CONTROL HAS ITS ROOTS IN DURKHEIM’S ANOMIE THEORY == THE EARLIEST SOCIAL
CONTROL THEORIES EXPLAINED HOW SOME TYPES OF SOCIAL STRUCTURES LED TO HIGH
RATES OF DEVIANCE. COMMUNITIES CHARACTERIZED BY POVERTY, PHYSICAL
DETERIORATION, AND INTERNAL CONFLICT WERE TOO DISORGANIZED TO EXERT
EFFECTIVE CONTROL OVER BEHAVIOUR OF RESIDENTS == THESE COMMUNITIES OFTEN HAVE
HIGH RATES OF SUICIDE, MENTAL ILLNESS, SUBSTANCE ABUSE, AND CRIME
{MOST THEORIES OF
DEVIANCE ASK THE QUESTION: "WHY DO THEY DO IT?" CONTROL THEORISTS
REVERSE THIS QUESTION, ASKING: "WHY DON’T WE ALL DO IT? WHY DO PEOPLE NOT
ENGAGE IN DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR? }
WALTER RECKLESS (1967) DEVELOPED A THEORY
OF SOCIAL CONTROL, WHICH STATES THAT CERTAIN FACTORS DRAW PEOPLE
TOWARD DEVIANCE WHILE OTHERS "INSULATE" THEM FROM SUCH BEHAVIOR
== PEOPLE ARE DRAWN TO DEVIANCE BY POVERTY, UNEMPLOYMENT, AND LACK OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY. THEY ALSO MAY BE INFLUENCED BY MEMBERS OF
DEVIANT SUBCULTURES, MEDIA DEPICTIONS OF DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR, AND THEIR OWN FEELINGS OF
FRUSTRATION, HOSTILITY OR INFERIORITY == HOWEVER, MANY PEOPLE DO NOT TURN TO
DEVIANCE BECAUSE THEY ARE INSULATED BY OUTER CONTAINMENTS, SUCH AS
SUPPORTIVE FAMILY AND FRIENDS, REASONABLE SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS, AND SUPERVISION BY OTHERS, AND BY INNER
CONTAINMENTS, SUCH AS SELF-CONTROL, A SENSE OF RESPONSIBILITY, AND RESISTANCE TO UNLAWFUL
DIVERSIONS.
TRAVIS HIRSCHI
(1969) [[EXTENDING THE THEORY]] SUGGESTED THAT DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR IS MINIMIZED
WHEN PEOPLE HAVE STRONG BONDS THAT BIND THEM TO FAMILIES, SCHOOL, PEERS,
CHURCHES, AND OTHER SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS == SOCIAL BOND THEORY HOLDS THAT
THE PROBABILITY OF DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR INCREASES WHEN A PERSON’S TIES TO SOCIETY ARE WEAKENED OR BROKEN
ACCORDING TO
HIRSCHI, SOCIAL BONDING CONSISTS OF (1) ATTACHMENT TO OTHER PEOPLE; COMMITMENT
TO CONVENTIONAL LINES OF BEHAVIOUR, SUCH AS SCHOOLING AND JOB SUCCESS; (3) INVOLVEMENT IN
CONVENTIONAL ACTIVITIES; AND (4) BELIEF IN THE LEGITIMACY OF CONVENTIONAL VALUES AND NORMS.
SYMBOLIC
INTERACTIONIST PERSPECTIVES ON CRIME
[[ACCORDING TO
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISTS, DEVIANCE IS LEARNED IN THE SAME WAY AS CONFORMITY–
THROUGH INTERACTION WITH OTHERS]]
DIFFERENTIAL
ASSOCIATION THEORY == MORE THAN A HALF CENTURY AGO, EDWIN SUTHERLAND (1939)
DEVELOPED A THEORY TO EXPLAIN HOW PEOPLE LEARN DEVIANCE THROUGH SOCIAL
INTERACTION == "DIFFERENTIAL ASSOCIATION THEORY"
STATES THAT INDIVIDUALS HAVE A GREATER TENDENCY TO DEVIATE FROM SOCIETAL NORMS
WHEN THEY FREQUENTLY ASSOCIATE WITH PERSONS WHO FAVOUR DEVIANCE OVER
CONFORMITY.
DIFFERENTIAL
ASSOCIATION IS MOST LIKELY TO RESULT IN DEVIANT ACTIVITY WHEN A PERSON HAS FREQUENT, INTENS, AND LONG-STANDING INTERACTION
WITH OTHERS WHO VIOLATE THE RULES == WHEN THERE ARE MORE FACTORS FAVOURING
VIOLATION OF THE LAW THAN THERE ARE OPPOSING IT, THE PERSON IS MORE LIKELY TO BECOME A CRIMINAL. TIES TO
OTHER DEVIANTS CAN BE PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT IN THE WORLD OF ORGANIZED CRIME,
WHERE WILLINGNESS OF PEERS TO STAND UP FOR ONE ANOTHER CAN BE CRITICAL IN
MAINTAINING POWER IN THE FACE OF VIOLENT OPPOSITION FROM COMPETITORS ==
[[CRITICS ASSERT
THAT THE THEORY DOES NOT ADEQUATELY ASSESS POSSIBLE LINKAGES BETWEEN SOCIAL INEQUALITY
AND CRIMINAL BEHAVOUR]].
LABELLING
THEORY
== SUGGESTS THAT DEVIANTS ARE THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN
SUCCESSFULLY LABELLED AS SUCH BY OTHERS == LABELLING IS PART OF THE SOCIAL CONTROL
PROCESS == RELATED TO THE POWER AND STATUS OF THOSE PERSONS WHO
DO THE LABELLING AND THOSE PERSONS BEING LABELLED
ACCORDING TO HOWARD
BECKER (1963) "MORAL ENTREPRENEURS" ARE PERSONS WHO USE THEIR OWN
VIEWS OF RIGHT AND WRONG TO ESTABLISH RULES AND LABEL OTHERS AS DEVIANT == SO == MORAL ENTREPRENEURS
ARE PEOPLE OR GROUPS WHO TAKE
AN ACTIVE ROLE IN TRYING TO HAVE PARTICULAR BEHAVIOURS DEFINED AS DEVIANT
==
[[EX: GROUPS SUCH AS
MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING (MADD) HAVE PLAYED A ROLE IN GETTING
GOVERNMENTS TO INCREASE THE PENALTIES FOR DRUNK DRIVING AND IN EDUCATING THE PUBLIC
ABOUT THE DANGERS OF THIS BEHAVIOUR == COMMUNITY HEALTH ADVOCATES ACCOMPLISHED
THE SAME KIND OF "STIGMATIZATION" OF CIGARETTES AND SMOKING (NOW VIRTUALLY IN ALL PUBLIC PLACES)
THESE RULES ARE ENFORCED ON PERSONS WITH
LESS POWER == LABELS HAVE AN IMPACT ON SELF-IMAGE, LIFE-CHANCES AND SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT == EX:
BEING LABELLED (STIGMATIZED) A "DRUG ADDICT" CAN LEAD TO MAJOR
DIFFICULTIES IN GETTING A JOB EVEN AFTER SUCCESSFUL
TREATMENT. IF THE LABEL PREVENTS A DRUG ADDICT FROM RE-INTEGRATING INTO THE CONVENTIONAL
COMMUNITY, HE OR SHE MAY ACCEPT THIS DEVIANT STATUS AND RETURN TO HIS OR HER FRIENDS
IN THE DRUG WORLD.
[[CRITICS ARGUE THAT
LABELLING THEORY DOES NOT EXPLAIN WHAT "CAUSES" THE ORIGINAL ACTS
THAT MAKE UP DEVIANCE. NOR DOES IT PROVIDE INSIGHT INTO WHY SOME PEOPLE ACCEPT DEVIANT
LABELS AND OTHERS DO NOT.]]
THE CONFLICT
APPROACH
== CONFLICT THEORIST ARE INTERESTED IN HOW CERTAIN KINDS OF PEOPLE AND BEHAVIOUR, AND NOT OTHERS, COMES TO BE
DEFINED AS DEVIANT == ACCORDING TO CONFLICT THEORISTS, PEOPLE IN
POSITIONS OF POWER MAINTAIN THEIR ADVANTAGE BY USING THE LAW TO PROTECT THEIR
OWN INTERESTS == LIFESTYLES CONSIDERED DEVIANT BY THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC ELITE ARE OFTEN DEFINED AS ILLEGAL.
[[EX: == IN OUR
SOCIETY, THOSE WHO COMMIT WELFARE FRAUD ARE MORE LIKELY TO FACE CRIMINAL
CHARGES THAN ARE PROFESSIONALS WHOSE MISCONDUCT IS GENERALLY DEALT WITH BY DISCIPLINARY
COMMITTEES OF THEIR PEERS RATHER THAN BY CRIMINAL COURTS. THE RELATIVE
DEGREE OF SOCIAL HARM CAUSE BY EITHER OF THESE GROUPS SEEMS TO HAVE LITTLE
RELEVANCE IN THE DETERMINATION OF WHO IS DEFINED AS CRIMINAL; WHAT MATTERS
MORE MAY BE THE POWER OF SOME GROUPS TO RESIST SANCTIONS.
{{ACCORDING TO KARL
MARX == INSTITUTIONS (SUCH AS LAW, POLITICS, AND EDUCATION) MAKE UP A
SUPERSTRUCTURE IN SOCIETY THAT LEGITIMIZES THE CLASS STRUCTURE AND MAINTAINS THE CAPITALISTS’ SUPERIOR POSITION IN IT. CRIME IS AN
EXPRESSION OF THE INDIVIDUAL’S STRUGGLE AGAINST THE UNJUST SOCIAL CONDITIONS AND INEQUALITY PRODUCED BY
CAPITALISM}}
ACCORDING TO RICHARD
QUINNEY (1980), PEOPLE WITH ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL PWOER DEFINE AS
CRIMINAL ANY BEHAVIOUR THAT THREATENS THEIR OWN INTERESTS. THE POWERFUL USE THE
LAW TO CONTROL THOSE WHO ARE WITHOUT POWER ==
[[EX: DRUG LAWS ENACTED IN EARLY TWENTIETH
CENTRUY WERE PASSED AND ENFORCED IN AN EFFORT TO CONTROL IMMIGRANT WORKERS, PARTICULARLY
CHINESE WORKERS, WHO WERE MORE INCLINED THAN OTHERS TO SMOKE OPIUM == THE LAWS WERE MOTIVATED BY RACISM
MORE THAN BY A REAL CONCERN WITH DRUGS]]
ACCORDING TO
CONFLICT THEORISTS, THE POOR COMMIT STREET CRIMES IN ORDER TO SURVIVE;
THEY FIND THAT THEY CANNOT AFFORD THE NECESSARY ESSENTIALS SUCH AS FOOD, CLOTHING, SHELTER, AND HEALTH CARE. THUS, SOME CRIME
REPRESENTS A RATIONAL RESPONSE BY THE POOR TO THE UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF
RESOURCES IN SOCIETY == FURTHER, LIVING IN POVERTY MAY LEAD TO VIOLENT CRIME AND VICTIMIZATION OF
THE POOR BY THE POOR {EX: VIOLENT GANG ACTIVITY MAY BE A COLLECTIVE RESPONSE
OF YOUNG PEOPLE TO SEEMINGLY HOPELESS POVERTY}
[[CRITICS POINT OUT
THAT THIS THEORY EXPLAINS SOME TYPES OF LAWS, BUT NOT OTHERS. PEOPLE OF ALL CLASSES SHARE A CONSENSUS
ABOUT THE CRIMINALITY OF CERTAIN ACTS == LAWS THAT PROHIBIT MURDER, RAPE, AND ARMED ROBBERY PROTECT NOT
ONLY MIDDLE- AND UPPER-INCOME PEOPLE BUT ALSO LOW-INCOME PEOPLE, WHO
FREQUENTLY ARE VICTIMS OF SUCH VIOLENT CRIME (KLOCKARS, 1979) == WHILE SOME LAWS DO PROTECT THE RICH AND POWERFUL, OTHERS REFLECT THE
INTERESTS OF ALL CITIZENS.]]
FEMINIST
PERSPECTIVES ON CRIME AND DEVIANCE
CAN THEORIES
DEVELOPED TO EXPLAIN MALE BEHAVIOUR HELP US UNDERSTAND FEMALE DEVIANCE AND CRIME?
ACCORDING TO SOME
FEMINISTS SCHOLARS, THE ANSWER IS NO. THE FEW EARLY STUDIES THAT WERE CONDUCTED
ON "MONE’S CRIMES" FOCUSED ALMOSTE EXCLUSIVELY ON PROSTITUTION AND ATTRIBUTED THE CAUSE OF THIS
CRIME TO WOMEN’S BIOLOGICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL "INFERIORITY".
AS LATE AS THE 1980S
RESEARCHERS WERE STILL LOOKING FOR UNIQUE PREDISPOSING FACTORS THAT LED WOMEN
TO COMMIT CRIME, WHICH WAS OFTEN SEEN AS INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY RATHER THAN
AS A RESPONSE TO THEIR SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT. THESE THEORIES, WHICH REINFORCED
EXISTING FEMALE STEREOTYPES, HAVE HAD A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON BOTH OUR
UNDERSTANDING AND OUR TREATMENT OF FEMALE OFFENDERS.
A NEW INTEREST IN WOMEN AND DEVIANCE DEVELPED IN 1975
WHEN TWO BOOKS – FREDA ADLER’S SISTERS IN CRIME AND RITA JAMES SIMON’S WOMEN AND CRIME – DECLARED THAT WOMEN’S
CRIME RATES WERE GOING TO INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY AS A RESULT OF THE WOMEN’S
LIBERATION MOVEMENT ==
ALTHOUGH THIS
SO-CALLED EMANCIPATION THEROY OF FEMALE CRIME HAS BEEN STRONGLTY CRITICIZED BY
SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS (COMACK, 2000) ADLER’S AND SIMON’S WORK ENCOURAGED FEMINIST SCHOLARS
(BOTH WOMEN AND MEN) TO EXAMINE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GENDER, DEVIANCE AND CRIME MORE CLOSELY.
[[THERE IS NO
SINGLE FEMINIST PERSPECTIVE ON DEVIANCE AND CRIME, BUT THERE ARE THREE SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT
THAT HAVE EMERGED]] ==
LIBERAL
FEMINISM
è EXPLAINS WOMEN’S DEVIANCE AND CRIME AS A RATIONAL RESPONSE
TO GENDER DISCRIMINATION EXPERIENCED IN WORK, MARRIAGE, AND INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
== SOME FEMALE CRIMES MAY BE ATTRIBUTED TO WOMEN’S LACK OF EDUCATIONAL AND JOB OPPORTUNITIES AND STEREOTYPICAL EXPECTATIONS
ABOUT WHAT ROLES WOMEN SHOULD HAVE IN SOCIETY è [[EX: A WOMEN IS NOT MORE
LIKELY TO BE A BIG-TIME DRUG DEALER OR AN ORGANIZED CRIME BOSS THAN SHE IS TO
BE A CORPORATE DIRECTOR {SEE DALY AND CHESNEY-LIND, 1988; SIMPSON, 1989}]]
RADICAL
FEMINISM
è SUGGESTS THAT PATRIARCHY
(MALE DOMINATION OVER FEMALES) KEEPS WOMEN MORE TIED TO FAMILY AND HOME, EVEN IF WOMEN ALSO WORK FULL TIME è BASED ON THIS APPROACH, PROSTITUTION
MIGHTY BE EXPLAINED AS A REFLECTION OF SOCIETY’S SEXUAL DOUBLE STANDARD,
WHEREBY IT IS ACCEPTABLE FOR A MAN TO PAY FOR SEX BUT
UNACCEPTABLE FOR A WOMAN TO ACCEPT MONEY FOR SUCH SERVICES è ALTHOUGH PROSTITURTION LAWS IN CANADA DEFINE BOTH THE
PROSTITUTE AND THE CUSTOMER AS VIOLATING THE LAW, WOMEN ARE FAR MORE LIKELY THAN MEN TO
BE ARRESTED, BROUGHT TO TRIAL, CONVICTED AND SENTENCED FOR PROSTITUTION
RELATED OFFENSES.
SOCIALIST
FEMINISM
è CONTENDS THAT WOMEN ARE EXPLOITED BY CAPITALISM AND PATRIARCHY è BECAUSE MOST FEMALES HAVE
RELATIVELY LOW-WAGE JOBS AND FEW ECONOMIC RESOURCES, CRIMES SUCH AS PROSTITUTION AND SHOPLIFTING BECOME A MEANS
TO EARN MONEY OR ACQUIRE CONSUMER PRODUCTS è INSTEAD OF FREEING WOMEN FROM THEIR PROBLEMS, HOWEVER,
PROSTITUTION INSTITUTIONALIZES WOMEN’S DEPENDENCE ON MEN AND RESULTS IN A FORM OF FEMALE SEXUAL SLAVERY (VITO AND HOLMES, 1994)
[[RECENT FEMINIST
CRITICS HAVE OBSERVED THAT THESE SCHOOLS OF FEMINIST THOUGHT HAVE NOT PLACED
SUFFICIENT EMPHASIS ON RACE AND ETHNICITY IN THEIR ANALYSES è STUDIES NOW ARE BEGINNING TO FOCUS ON THE SIMULTANEOUS EFFECTS OF RACE, CLASS, AND GENDER ON DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR è {EX: REGINA ARNOLD (1990)
ATTRIBUTES MANY OF THE WOMEN’S OFFENCES TO LIVING IN FAMILIES IN WHICH (HISTORY
OF ) SEXUAL ABUSE, INCEST, AND OTHER VIOLENCE LEFT THEM WITH FEW CHOICES
EXCEPT TO ENGAGE IN DEVIANCE è ECONOMIC MARGINALITY AND RACISM ALSO CONTRIBUTED TO THEIR
VICTIMIZATION è THESE CONCLUSIONS HAVE BEEN
REINFORCED IN SEVERAL RECENT STUDIES EXAMINING THE {PATTERNED} RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN WOMEN’S EARLIER VICTIMIZATION AND THEIR SUBSEQUENT INVOLVEMENT
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM {COMACK, 2000}]].