Lecture November 4

Citizenship.1 – Nov. 4, 2002

Overview of 3rd Phase of the Course:

Analyzing the effects on the average citizen of the extensive use of networked computers in today's "Information Age, " and, where applicable, to look at these issues within our democratic nation-state of Canada


1. need to consider issues in an historical perspective:

--> look at evolution of rights and responsibilities of a citizen in a nation-state (lecture Nov. 4)

2. look at devolution of powers of nation-state in light of other power sources:

--> conflict between idea of "global village" (Cyberspace Manifesto) and continuance of nation-states and citizens' rights

--> positive and negative aspects of globalization (lectures Nov. 6 and 13)

3. Case study of Singapore as a country defining itself as an “Information Age’ nation (Nov. 11)

4. Using Feather’s article as the beginning point, we will look at Canadian citizens’ needs to be involved in questions of:

--> What information should we have access to freely, what information should we pay for? – copyright issues (Nov. 18 lecture)

--> What information should be protected? Who owns information?
privacy issues (Nov. 20 lecture)

--> What information should we not have access to? Censorship issues (Nov. 25 lecture)

--> as citizens what govt. information do we need access to? Access issues (Nov. 27 lecture)

If restrictions to the free flow of ALL information is required, than what technological, legal, political and social actions will suffice? (what involvement of governments)?
****************************
Today’s lecture:

1. What did it mean to be a citizen in a “Pre-Information-Age” democratic nation-state?

2. Divisions of the world “pre-Information Age”...Contrast to “globalizatio
***************

1. What did it mean to be a citizen in a “Pre-Information-Age” democratic nation-state?

1.1. What is a “Nation-State”? “peoples living in a geographically determined area and forming a society under one government”

N.B.: “...only in a few rare cases [e.g., Sweden, Japan] do the political boundaries of the state correspond to the reality of a nation comprising a single people sharing characteristics of language, culture and common origins. Nor are boundaries all-encompassing...” (Chodos, Murphy & Hamovitch, 1993, p.43)

1.2. In a democratic nation-state, what are the rights of the citizens?:

Mosco summarizes Marshall's (1964) 3 steps in the evolution of citizenship:

--> first, the legal sense of basic rights and protections (habeas corpus, due process, etc.)

--> then citizenship extended to encompass political rights (right to vote and public assembly)

--> then "social democracy stretches the notion to include the right to employment, housing, health care, and other social welfare benefits."

1.3. democracy (according to Mosco) :
-->“requires the fullest possible public participation in the decisions that affect our lives.”

--> no just casting a vote in elections:

-->people must be able to participate in decision-making--in ALL aspects of a nation-state - and in order to participate people need PUBLIC, easily-accessible information

and so the concern that the Internet is becoming a private “highway” rather than a public information conduit

"It is especially important to invoke citizenship today because much of what we see in the media, [including on the Internet] . . . addresses people as consumers or as audiences. Citizenship elevates human activity beyond the. . .view that the best way. . . to define human activity is by its marketplace value, its worth as a consuming or laboring commodity." (Mosco, 1997: on-line)]

--> so in 2000, citizens need guarantees of the “right to information” (see Gutstein, E.con: How the Internet Undermines Democracy, 1999)

2. Divisions of the world: pre-Information Age”

Things were relatively stable after W.W.II when the world’s nation-states were divided into 3 “worlds” depending on their economies:

1st world: Western democratic - market economies

2nd world: Communist world - planned economies

3rd world: non-aligned countries - evolved into meaning “economically underdeveloped and deprived countries”
(also known now as LDC’s - Less Developed Countries)

--> Then in 1989, communism fell in Soviet Union, and by then some 3rd world countries (especially in Southeast Asia) were developing economically very quickly.

This dissolution of “worlds + development of information technologies + rise of ideology of neo-conservatism (discussed in next lecture), means we move into globalization

2.1. Instead of “worlds” the thrust is “globalization”:

“the process of globalization consists of erasing of national borders in the production and distribution of goods.” (Chodos, Murphy and Hamovitch, p. 17)
-->question becomes what happens to our “rights” as citizens of a nation-state when the national border is erased?

This page last revised 9/17/02