Information. continued -
Sept. 30, 2002
Overview of lecture:
1. Continued discussion on ways to organize INFORMATION
so that it can be retrieved (case studies of
writing and the printing press) AND the effects these new technics
have on us:
1. How did oral cultures organize information
so that it could be retrieved? - e.g., redundancy - one effect-conservative
society
2. How did WRITING change the
way we organize information? (see Luria's experiments) - one
effect - leads to abstract thought
3. How did the PRINTING PRESS
help us organize information? - leads to propensity for "linear
thought" - effects society in economic, social and political
ways
*********
Ong’s (1982) schema designates different periods
Eras: |
Primary Orality |
Literacy |
Secondary Orality |
|
|
Chiro-Graphic |
Typo-Graphic |
|
Time |
|
800 BCE |
1450’s |
1940’s |
Technics |
words |
Clay, Ink, Etc |
Printing Press |
Radio, TV, Computer |
How was information retrieved without
writing it down? (see Ong, 1982, chapter 3 of Orality and Literacy)
What happened to humans when we moved
from orality to literacy?
Luria, (a psychologist in the 1930’s in
the former Soviet Union), showed illiterate peasants:
4 pictures (of a hammer, saw, log, and hatchet); then he asked
them to group them.
--> they responded concretely (responding to situations they
had been in); we respond to the same task abstractly
anecdote of “white bear”
(a syllogism:
In the far north, where there is snow, al bears are white.
Novaya Zembla is in the Far North and there is always snow there.
What colour are the bears?) We know the answer is “white”
but illiterates replied “I don’t know I’ve
never seen a white bear”)
This is evidence that being literate (going to
school to learn to read and write) changes the way humans think
- when writing became the preferred mode of communication
for important information, the message got separated from the
sender and receiver
(s) --> TEXT --> (r)
text becomes much more important; techniques evolve
to aid in gathering, storing and retrieving messages. (problems
with manuscripts)
With printing press FORMATTING possibilities allow for information
to be stored and retrieved relatively easily.
What is the format of the non-fiction
book that allows us efficient access to information? (compare
with manuscript format.)
· space between words
· paragraphs
· pagination
· Table of Contents
chapters with titles
· different Fonts (Helvetica)
· subheadings with different font sizes
· conventions of bolding, italics, underlining
· Index (keyword alphabetic search)
· footnotes and/or endnotes (for extended analysis +
citation purposes)
· Bibliography
· maps, charts, graphs, pictures
· author’s name/publisher/date of publication
Why could we argue that the Index is the most
important organizing feature?
Effect of the printing press:
- we became “linear thinkers”—went
from left to right (depending on writing system), we lost sense
of community, only relied on our eyes for primary intake of
information (see McLuhan’s work)
-world changed:
- democracies developed because people could read for themselves
- private property now included one’s ideas (emergency
of plagiarism)
- emphasis on literacy meant development of universal schooling
- implemented rise of Protestantism
(see Eisenstein’s The Printing Press as an Agent of Change,
1979)
etc.
|