skip to page contentYork University

Redefine the possible.

http://www.yorku.ca/yorkweb/includes/yorkheader/space.gif

Prospective students

Current students

Faculty & staff

Alumni

Visitors

York crest

Home

Syllabus

Assignments

Notes

Resources

Contact

 

LING 6450 Discourse analysis and pragmatics (Winter 2011)

 

 

Assignments

Click here to access the COURSE READINGS (on Moodle)..

Transcription project

You will be expected to record and transcribe a sequence of spoken interaction of about 20 minutes or more. The transcription should be done with a software program that permits the linking of text and sound (preferably with ELAN, which is pre-installed on most computers in the MATAL lab). This work is best done in groups of up to three students. You may want to start thinking right away about what kind of interaction you would like to (and would be able to) record. Remember also that recordings will have to follow York approval procedures for research ethics. Relevant information can be found here. Please take the ethics tutorial at your earliest convenience. Due date: February 17

Transcript analysis assignments

#1, due March 3

In no more than three pages (including brief transcription excerpts), analyze aspects of your transcript with respect to this week's (and last week’s) course readings. Here are some questions that you could pursue (don't feel like you need to address all of them, they are just suggestions): How is your understanding of the transcribed interaction enriched by the concept of adjacency pair or by a close application of the participation framework (e.g. in multi-party discourse, how do participant roles change). What kind of repairs are there, if any? What kind of questions? Is there a closing sequence?

#2, due March 10

In about three pages (including brief transcription excerpts), analyze aspects of your transcript with respect to this week's course readings (especially Schiffrin). Here are some questions that you could pursue (don't feel like you need to address all of them, they are just suggestions): What kind of discourse markers do speakers employ, for what ends? Are there differences between speakers with regard to the use of discourse markers? How do you interpret your findings?