York University

AP/POLS 4546 3.0

Politics, Society and Democracy in the United States

Winter 2019

 

 

Instructor:                  Prof. Rodney Loeppky

Office:                           South Ross 631

Class Location:           ACW 304

Time:                            Wednesday, 14:30

Office Hours:              Wednesday, 12:00-14:00

 

 

Course Description

 

This course is intended as a senior seminar on American politics and society.  The material moves beyond a basic understanding of US political institutions and explores American political realities in a thematic manner.  We will consider the relevance of various issues for the overall shape of US political culture, as well as the potentialities and limits of its political governance.   Course content is drawn from various political and academic perspectives, and the aim is to push students to appreciate and engage the complexities of political governance and citizenship in the United States.

 

Course Requirements

 

The seminar is not intended as a lecture-based course.  A fourth year seminar requires active participation by students, who help each other to embrace and learn course material through interaction.  The successful execution of the seminar will be heavily reliant on students coming prepared and ready to participate.  ‘Participation’ needs to be understood in a specific manner.  Some students find it hard to intervene in discussion while others are very much at ease.  Be clear, however: every student has something to bring to the table, and students need to strive to intervene and participate in a respectful and productive manner.  This means that while it is nice to ‘make a point’ successfully, it is far better to have a productive interaction with your fellow student, drawing out his/her perspective in a fruitful manner. 

 

The seminar will be broken down each week into two elements, the first half focusing on the academic content of the readings and a discussion by the class in common.  The second half will be composed of group work and inter-group discussion, based on topical issues related to the day’s exploratory theme.  The participation grade will be assessed on the basis of student activity in both components of the seminar, and there are no ‘alternative’ ways to earn points.

 

 

Grade breakdown:

 

Participation:                         20%

Group presentations:            20% (2 × 10%)

Term paper:                          50%                            (Due Wednesday, November 6)

Final Exam:                            10%                            (Distributed, Wednesday, November 27th)

 

·      Group work: The instructor will divide the class into 5 groups.  In the second half of each seminar, questions will be issued to each group, with a specific task to be approached from a particular perspective.  Group work, negotiation and full debate will ensue.  The goal is to see, in a practical manner, the degree to which particular political issues can be reconciled between opposing positions.

·      Group presentations: Group presentations will run as part of the abovementioned group work, during the full debate portion. On two occasions, two groups will be responsible to lead debate on opposing sides.  Other class members may certainly ‘chime in’, but the ‘presenting’ groups are expected to take a leading role.  Group coordination is important here, and it is important that all presenting group members play a role in the debate.  You are operating as a group, but you will be evaluated on an individual score out of 10.  Each group will be responsible to present twice in the semester.  As should be clear, these are simply a normal part of group work, and they require no out-of-class preparation.

·      Term Paper: The term essay should be 10 pages, and it should be written on one of the weekly topics from the syllabus.  Each weekly topic should be considered a research domain, but it is the student’s responsibility to craft a specific, critical thesis and argument within this domain.  Please note, if you have written on one of these topics in POLS 3540, do not repeat the same topic.

·      Final Exam: This will be a take home exam, and it will incorporate themes from the course.  You will be given a strict word and time limit, as well as a specific format.  It will be returned by email by the designated deadline.

 

 

 

Weekly Readings:

 

Week 1: Introduction to course and group organization.

 

Week 2: Ideological Divides – the Right in America

 

Vanessa Williamson, Theda Skocpol, and John Coggin, “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol.9, No.1 (2011): 25-43.

Charlie Post, “The Republicans Have Been Trumped,” The Brooklyn Rail, October 4, 2016.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Paul Waldman, “Trump will knuckle under to the NRA. And Republicans will pay the price,” Washington Post, 6 August, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/08/06/trump-will-knuckle-under-nra-republicans-will-pay-price/

 

 

Week 3: Ideological Divides – the Left in America

 

Eli Zaretsky, “Reconsidering the American Left,” Socialist Register 2013 (London: Merlin, 2013).

Alan Abramowitz and Ruy Teixeira, “The Decline of the White Working Class and the Rise of a Mass Upper-Middle Class,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol.124, No.3 (2009): 391-421.

Michael Kazin, “Whatever Happened to the American Left?” New York Times, Sept 24, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/25/opinion/sunday/whatever-happened-to-the-american-left.html

 

GROUP WORK READING: Michael Grunwald, “Climate Change Could Be a Problem in 2020… for Democrats,” Politico, 3 September, 2019.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/03/climate-change-democratic-candidates-2020-227910

 

Week 4: America – Secular State or Theocracy?

 

Mark Silk, “Defining Religious Pluralism in America: A Regional Analysis,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, No.612 (July 2007): 64-81.

Mark A. Smith, “Religion, Divorce and the Missing Culture War in America,” Political Science Quarterly, Vol.125, No.1 (2010): 57-85.

Bryan T. McGraw, American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us (Review), The Journal of Politics, Vol. 74, No. 4 (2012): 44-7.

Jean Bethke Elshtain, American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us (Review), Perspectives on Politics, Vol.10, No.1 (2012): 107-10.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Clyde Haberman, “Religion and Right-Wing Politics: How Evangelicals Reshaped Elections” New York Times, 28 October, 2018 .

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/us/religion-politics-evangelicals.html

 

 

Week 5: Racial Divides and Politics in America

 

Lawrence D. Bobo and Camille Z. Charles, “Race in the American Mind: From the Moynihan Report to the Obama Candidacy,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, No.621 (Jan 2009): 243-59.

Joel Olson, “Whiteness and the Polarization of American Politics,” Political Research Quarterly, Volume 61 Number 4 (2008): 704-18.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Peter Baker, “Trump Fans the Flames of Racial Fire,” New York Times, 14 July, 2019.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/14/us/politics/trump-twitter-race.html/

 

Week 6: America: a Land of Immigration?

 

Rhys H. Williams, “Immigration and National Identity in Obama’s America: The Expansion of Culture-War Politics,” Canadian Review of American Studies, Vol. 42, no. 3 (2012): 322-46.

Eric Leon McDaniel, Irfan Nooruddin and Allyson Faith Shortle, “Divine Boundaries: How Religion Shapes Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Immigrants,” American Politics Research, Vol. 39, No.1 (2011) 205–233.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Alan Gomez, “Undocumented immigrants on edge as new Trump immigration policy calls for more deportations,” USA Today, 13 August 2019.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/08/13/new-trump-immigration-policy-means-more-deportations-across-us/1880847001/

 

Week 7: The Politics of Fear and Security

 

Mitat Çelikpala and Duygu Öztürk, “The Only Thing We Have to Fear: Post-9/11 Institutionalization of In-security,” International Relations, Vol.8 (2012): 49-65.

Hakimeh Saghaye-Biria, “American Muslims as radicals? A critical discourse analysis of the US congressional hearing on ‘The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community and That Community’s Response’,” Discourse & Society, Vol.23, No.5(2012) 508–24.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Kate Tummarello, “Debunking the Patriot Act as it Turns 15,” Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 26, 2016.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/10/debunking-patriot-act-it-turns-15

 

Week 8: The Military, Militarization & America’s ‘Complexes’

 

Rebecca U. Thorpe, “The Role of Economic Reliance in Defense Procurement Contracting,” American Politics Research, Vol.38, No.4 (2010) 636–75.

James Fallows, “The Military Industrial Complex,” Foreign Policy, Vol.133 (Nov/Dec 2002): 133-6.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Danny Vinik, “Can Trump end Washington’s biggest budget gimmick?” Politico Online, December 29, 2016.

http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2016/12/can-trump-end-washingtons-biggest-budget-gimmick-000263

 

Week 9: Corporate America – What Does it Mean for Politics?

 

Richard Marens, “Generous in victory? American managerial autonomy, labour relations and the invention of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Socio-Economic Review, Vol.10 (2012): 59–84.

John Godard, “The Exceptional Decline of the American Labour Movement,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 63, No. 1 (2009): 82-108.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Ben Steverman, Dave Merrill and Jeremy C.F. Lin, “A Year After the Middle Class Tax Cut, the Rich Are Winning,” Bloomberg, 18 December 2019. www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-tax-plan-consequences/

 

 

Week 10: Finance in America

 

David Coates, “Separating Sense from Nonsense in the US Debate on the Financial Meltdown,” Political Studies Review, Vol.8 (2010): 15–26.

Doug Henwood, “Before and After the Crisis: Wall Street Lives On,” Socialist Register 2011 (London: Merlin, 2011).

Leonard Seabrooke, “What Do I Get? The Everyday Politics of Expectations and the Subprime Crisis,” New Political Economy, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2010): 52-70.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Laurence Kotlikoff, “Dodd-Frank’s Terrible Excuse for Financial Reform Lives On,” Forbes, 11 June 2018. www.forbes.com/sites/kotlikoff/2018/06/11/dodd-franks-terrible-excuse-for-financial-reform-sadly-lives-on/#4231bea8315d

 

Week 11: Financing Fiscal America – Social Policy in a Neoliberal Era

 

James Crotty, “The great austerity war: what caused the US deficit crisis and who should pay to fix it?” Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.36 (2012): 79–104.

John Geyman, “Crisis in US Health Care: Corporate Power Still Blocks Reform,” International Journal of Health Services 48, No.1 (2017): 5-27.

 

GROUP WORK READING: Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, “Americans like Obamacare.  They just don’t know it yet,” NBC News online, January 7, 2017.

http://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-care/americans-obamacare-they-just-don-t-know-it-n704736

 

Week 12: The American City– A Politics of Urban ‘Decay’ and ‘Revival’

 

David Harvey, “The Urban of Financial Crisis: Re-claiming the City for Anti-capitalist Struggle,” Socialist Register 2012 (London: Merlin, 2012).

Jennifer Hochschild, “Race and Cities: New Circumstances Imply New Ideas,” Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 10, No. 3 (2012): 647-58.

 

GROUP WORK READING: James Howard Kunstler, “The Landscape of Despair: How Our Cities And Towns Are Killing Us,” Daily Caller, 3 September 2019.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/03/cities-towns-landscape-despair/