Developing Critical Discussion Skills





Some Diversities of Thinkers

(based on Myers-Briggs as explored by John C. Bean Engaging Ideas (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996), 161-163.

Extroverts:
  • think through ideas/issues by discussing it with others
  • typically vocal & may shift/redevelop perspectives/arguments throughout discussion
Introverts:
  • think through ideas/issues privately
  • typically listen & are not comfortable with participating in group discussion until own perspective developed
  • thought process valuable & they should be gently encouraged to discuss ideas
Perceivers:
  • want to talk through all possible perspectives and resist early closure
Judgers:
  • reach decisions rapidly and can be impatient if feels that others are "talking an issue to death"
  • may interpret discussion as indecision rather than cautious reflection


Gender Socialization in the West
Men
  • generally socialized to making decisions based on abstract rigorous application of principles
  • studies reveal they typically take more time/space in discussion than women
Women
  • generally socialized to be more concerned with interpersonal dimensions of decisions


Cultural Dimensions/Diversity

People educated primarily in Western cultures, particularly North American cultures, often state their points/ideas/desires in ways that are considered rude and/or problematic in other cultures (e.g., bluntness may be considered rude in some cultures, pointing may be considered rude in some cultures)


Some Problematic Responses To Consider

Egothink
  • when members of a class express their won opinions loudly and inflexibly with no attempt to take the ideas to another point/level of understanding
Clonethink
  • when members of a class agree with the first view expressed with no attempt to discuss/explore it and see if it can be taken further

Some Helpful Points About Responses

Active Listening
  • listen – to hear – the complete issue/point before expressing disagreement
  • ask yourself
    • can I accurately summarize the argument/point?
    • is there some aspect of this perspective that is outside of my experience and might that be a crucial element in understanding the complexities of this position?
    • what do I need in order to clarify my understanding?
  • don't hesitate to raise questions to assist you in clarifying the issue/point before raising points that elaborate it, shift it, or express disagreement with it
  • once you understand the point, jump into the discussion and share your perspective!

    Disagreement / Conflicting Ideas

    Remember, disagreement is positive and creative provided it does not include hurtful and oppressive dynamics/behaviours. The key, if possible, is to move to a synthesis of ideas that both address the conflicting positions and creates something deeper and more acountable to the original task/question, not to compromise to some point that is ineffective and unaccountable to it.








    Top of Page Rowley's Mainpage York Main Page