ORGS 2010 Library Session Evaluation Fall 2012
Page 1 of 1
1. Name of Librarian
Sophie Bury
Xuemei Li
2. Professor Name
Prof. Berengut
Prof. MacDermid
Prof. Westney
<b>General Evaluation</b>
3. The overall quality of the library session given to my class was:
1. Poor
2. Fair
3. Good
4. Very Good
5. Excellent
<b>Evaluation of the Library Instruction Session</b>
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
4. Overall, I learned a great deal from this session:
5. The quantity of material covered in this session was about right:
6. The session prepared me well for my course assignment or research project
7. What I learned has useful and relevant application beyond this course:
Evaluation of the Librarian
Please indicate your rating of the librarian who taught this session on a scale of poor to excellent for each of the following items:
1. Poor
2. Fair
3. Good
4. Very Good
5. Excellent
8. Clearly articulated the goals of the library instruction:
9. Demonstrated a good knowledge of the subject matter:
10. Communicated and organized ideas and concepts clearly:
11. Encouraged class questions and participation (where appropriate):
12. Held my interest
13. Used instructional aids (e.g. the handouts, Powerpoint, videos, web-based tools etc.) effectively when presenting the session:
<b>Comments</b>
14. What were the most useful things you learned during this library session?
15. I would have liked to learn more about:
16. How could this library session be improved?
17. Any other comments? (about the instructor or the library session)
Powered by
UCCASS v1.8.1
. Copyright © 2004
John W. Holmes
, All Rights Reserved