601 Company Research Workshop Evaluations - Winter 2017
Page 1 of 1
General Evaluation
1. The overall quality of the library workshop was:
1. Poor
2. Fair
3. Good
4. Very Good
5. Excellent
Evaluation of the Library Instruction Session
1. Strongly Disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
4. Agree
5. Strongly Agree
2. Overall, I learned a great deal from this workshop:
3. The quantity of material covered in this workshop was about right:
Evaluation of the Librarians
Please indicate your rating of the librarian(s) who taught this session on a scale of poor to excellent for each of the following items:
1. Poor
2. Fair
3. Good
4. Very Good
5. Excellent
4. Clearly articulated the goals of the workshop:
5. Demonstrated a good knowledge of the subject matter:
6. Communicated and organized ideas and concepts clearly:
7. Held my interest
8. Used instructional aids (e.g. the handouts, Powerpoint, videos, web-based tools etc.) effectively when presenting the workshop:
Comments
9. What were the most useful things you learned during this workshop?
10. How could this library workshop be improved?
11. Do you have recommendations for other ways in which the Bronfman Business Library could support students’ 601 experience through additional learning opportunities?
We are very interested to hear about any ideas you would like to share on the format or content our library programming should take, or what changes or enhancements we might offer to existing services to help students with the 601 experience.
12. Other comments:
Powered by
UCCASS v1.8.1
. Copyright © 2004
John W. Holmes
, All Rights Reserved