BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:-//WordPress - MECv7.32.0//EN
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.yorku.ca/edu/
X-WR-CALNAME:Faculty of Education
X-WR-CALDESC:Reinventing education for a diverse, complex world.
X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/Toronto
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Toronto
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Toronto
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20260308T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=03;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20261101T010000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
UID:MEC-d6beac7184414a6487a7edade4c0f2ef@yorku.ca
DTSTART;TZID=America/Toronto:20260512T110000
DTEND;TZID=America/Toronto:20260512T123000
DTSTAMP:20260413T125722Z
CREATED:20260413
LAST-MODIFIED:20260413
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:1
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SUMMARY:Investigating the place and value of GenAI feedback in instructed ESL writing: A comparison with peer and teacher feedback
DESCRIPTION:Presenter: Xiaosa Li (Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, China)\nThis study examines the types, revision impact, and perceived value of feedback from three sources (GenAI, peers, and teacher) in an ESL writing context. Drawing on a recognition-based framework that distinguishes recognitive and extra-recognitive feedback, the study investigates: (1) what types of feedback students receive from each source, (2) what types of revisions they make in response, and (3) how they perceive the value, effectiveness, and motivational impact of different feedback sources. Data were collected from 36 junior English majors across multiple drafting rounds and analyzed through NVivo coding of feedback function and focus, revision operations and levels, and student survey responses. Results show that GenAI feedback was overwhelmingly form-focused and functionally dense, frequently bundling evaluation, explanation, and suggestion within single comments. Teacher feedback exhibited greater meaning-level engagement and a more distributed functional structure, while peer feedback was primarily affective-relational. Revision patterns shifted from surface-level substitutions in early drafts to increased meaning-level additions and deletions in later rounds. Students rated teacher feedback highest in value, effectiveness, and motivational impact, followed by peer feedback, with GenAI rated lowest. Findings highlight the complementary but distinct pedagogical roles of human and AI-generated feedback.\nXiaosa Li graduated from Nanjing University with a PhD degree in applied linguistics. She now teaches in Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology. Her research interests include L2 writing, feedback literacy, and translation didactics.\n\n
URL:https://www.yorku.ca/edu/events/investigating-the-place-and-value-of-genai-feedback-in-instructed-esl-writing-a-comparison-with-peer-and-teacher-feedback/
ORGANIZER;CN=Office of the Associate Dean Research, Faculty of Education:MAILTO:
CATEGORIES:Conversations with Visiting Scholars,Faculty of Education,Research Office
LOCATION:Online via Zoom
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR