Skip to main content Skip to local navigation

Normative tensions in the popular representation of children with disabilities and animal-assisted therapy.

Normative tensions in the popular representation of children with disabilities and animal-assisted therapy.

Home » Faculty & Research » Our Research » Publications » Normative tensions in the popular representation of children with disabilities and animal-assisted therapy.

Normative tensions in the popular representation of children with disabilities and animal-assisted therapy.

Eric Mykhalovskiy

Refereed Article, 2020

Mykhalovskiy, E., Kanarek, R., Hastings, C., Doig, J., & Rock, M. (2020). Normative tensions in the popular representation of children with disabilities and animal-assisted therapy. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 9(2), 10–38.  

  Read Full Article

This article contributes to the critical disability and human-nonhuman animal studies literatures through a discourse analysis of newspaper stories about animal-assisted therapy (AAT) and children with disabilities published in the United States and Canada. The articles in our corpus form a recognizable genre that we call AAT human-nonhuman animal interest stories. We pose two central questions of the genre: (1) how is the therapeutic value of AAT constituted? and (2) what are the effects, in discourse, of associating nonhuman animals and children with disabilities in narratives of therapeutic benefit? We emphasize the normative tensions associated with the representation of children with disabilities and nonhuman animals in news stories about AAT. On one hand, news articles objectify children with disabilities, inscribe their need to be made “normal” and silence their own experiences of AAT. On the other hand, they are written in ways that extend and strengthen the disabled body and self through connections with nonhuman therapy animals. They disrupt sharp species distinctions and present narratives of how interspecies relationships formed through participation in AAT co-constitute the agency of nonhuman therapy animals and children with disabilities. We argue that the normative tensions in the popular representation of AAT present important possibilities for intervening in public discourse about disability and nonhuman animals.

Categories: