Redeeming
Children: Child Emigration to
1.
Child saving in the
*
80,000 British ‘home children’ sent to
* 100,000 on US orphan trains,
1850s to 1929
* Emigration promised safety valve for cities, salvation for the
individual child
* Emphasize children’s need for a family (as opposed to institution)
* Romanticized view of rural
‘frontier’
C. Different political context:
* US: western settlement & right to rise
* Britain/Canada: imperial
context
D. Paradox: reformers stress children’s need for
nurture, protection & education,
but
send children far away to work… alone
2.
A. 130,000 poor children shipped overseas btw 1619 (
B.
Child emigrants = under the legal
age of consent (public = guardian)
C.
Child emigration is essentially indentured
servitude
(children
required to work, not free to leave)
3. Economics of Child Emigration
A. British context: industry & working-class poverty → overcrowded institutions
B. Canadian
context: farmers need labour
* Ten times more Canadian families requested home
children than got them
4. Child Emigration as an Imperial Strategy
A. Children = bricks for empire-building;
Anglo-Saxon settlement on dominion lands
5. Child Savers (Maria Rye, Annie MacPherson, Thomas Barnardo)
6. Barnardo Children
in
A. By
1939: 39,000 Barnardo children sent to
B. Work
& indenture
- class action lawsuit by Harold Vennell (2002)