{"id":14724,"date":"2011-11-22T11:27:33","date_gmt":"2011-11-22T16:27:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.iposgoode.ca\/?p=14724"},"modified":"2011-11-22T11:27:33","modified_gmt":"2011-11-22T16:27:33","slug":"businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market"},"content":{"rendered":"

Geoff Goodson is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School and is enrolled in Professor Mgbeoji\u2019s Patents class in Fall 2011. As part of the course requirements, students are asked to write a blog on a topic of their choice.<\/em><\/p>\n

Amazon.com Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)<\/em><\/a> brings the Canadian legal debate over the patentability of business models to the forefront (and seems to settle the law), however, does this decision adequately address the concerns of Canadian businesses?<\/p>\n

The Federal Court of Appeal held, here, that there is no Canadian business-exception exclusion and further, critiqued the commissioner for her policy-driven decision to reject a patent on these grounds.\u00a0 Policy, it seems, is never an appropriate consideration in the granting of patents.\u00a0 Phelan J\u2019s reasoning zeroes in on the Shell Oil<\/a> and Schlumberger<\/a> decisions that, together, essentially hold that an abstract idea is not per se patentable, but will be patentable if it has a necessarily integrated method of practical application.\u00a0 Phelan maintains accordingly that if a business method is implemented as \u201cthe practical embodiment of the new knowledge,\u201d it may be patentable (just as any other qualified subject-matter.)\u00a0 However, in addition to formal legal propriety, the Commissioner\u2019s policy concerns remain important, as does the inexplicable reluctance of the court to examine them, or even to mention their substance.\u00a0 For, prima facie, there may be even more obvious policy reasons to re-think the business model exception.<\/p>\n

It is important to consider whether the patentability of business models is at odds with the underlying rationale for the patent system itself, even despite Federal Court\u2019s insistence on the integration component.\u00a0 Gleik<\/a> describes this rationale, for instance, as a Faustian bargain where \u201cinventors give up their secrets, publishing them for all to see and absorb, and in exchange, they get a 20-year government-sanctioned monopoly on their technology.\"\u00a0 And indeed, in the absence of a patent system, technological innovations might instead be withheld longer in order to facilitate inventors\u2019 meticulous plans to corner markets by other means (which, of course, is to the detriment of inventors without access to vast resources).\u00a0 The point is, unlike many technological innovations, most effective business models would be put into effect irregardless of their patentability because their disclosure already has an implicit economic incentive: the product (rather than the innovative method) already likely exists in the open market.\u00a0 This fact necessitates an expedient disclosure of effective methods because sales are based on the efficacy of that interaction or method and the less time the method is in effect, the less sales are generated.\u00a0 Thus, clearly, to orient business methods within a general patent rationale is an important starting point to understanding the propriety of such patents and crucially so, as the internet\u2019s information economy becomes an omni-pervasive business forum and thrusts this shift of patent protection broadly into the 21st century.<\/p>\n

In particular and especially in the midst of a global recession, to limit that expanding market by granting monopolies over business methods may prove detrimental. Counter to the underlying patent rationale, to protect business models actually limits innovation by limiting the distribution of more effective transactions in wider markets by confining that business model to only one competitor.\u00a0 Moreover, a patentable business model may threaten to limit that innovation to only the particular product, rather than subjecting its model to the scrutiny of diverse market needs in other products.\u00a0 Moreover, even regardless of those who are stopped from utilizing business model for other products, licenses are expensive and smaller business owners may be prejudiced in the expanding online economy.\u00a0 As one might predict, particularly given that so many internet businesses have started out extremely small and now dominate online, particularly because of the potential of such massive online exposure (such as was with Facebook and Google), more hurdles may have a considerable effect on the great potential smaller, but smarter businesses.\u00a0 Thus, protection for innovative methods of distribution and organization of businesses, prima facie, may be at the expense of the online market as a whole.\u00a0 While the Federal Court has given short shrift to policy arguments, there is an explicit need to orient the Canadian approach to business methods within the larger rationale of the patent system.\u00a0 For, in such precarious economic times, this is not business as usual.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Geoff Goodson is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School and is enrolled in Professor Mgbeoji\u2019s Patents class in Fall 2011. As part of the course requirements, students are asked to write a blog on a topic of their choice. Amazon.com Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) brings the Canadian legal debate over the patentability […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2140,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[280,141,10,1140],"tags":[1216],"class_list":["post-14724","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-innovation","category-patentability","category-patents","category-patents-course-topic","tag-geoff-goodson"],"yoast_head":"\n\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market - IPOsgoode<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market - IPOsgoode\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Geoff Goodson is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School and is enrolled in Professor Mgbeoji\u2019s Patents class in Fall 2011. As part of the course requirements, students are asked to write a blog on a topic of their choice. Amazon.com Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) brings the Canadian legal debate over the patentability […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IPOsgoode\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-22T16:27:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ccraig\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ccraig\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/22\\\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/22\\\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ccraig\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94\"},\"headline\":\"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-22T16:27:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/22\\\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":730,\"keywords\":[\"Geoff Goodson\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Innovation\",\"Patentability\",\"Patents\",\"Patents Course Topic\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/22\\\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/22\\\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\\\/\",\"name\":\"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market - IPOsgoode\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-22T16:27:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/22\\\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/22\\\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2011\\\/11\\\/22\\\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/\",\"name\":\"IPOsgoode\",\"description\":\"An Authoritive Leader in IP\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94\",\"name\":\"ccraig\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"ccraig\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/author\\\/ccraig\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market - IPOsgoode","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market - IPOsgoode","og_description":"Geoff Goodson is a JD candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School and is enrolled in Professor Mgbeoji\u2019s Patents class in Fall 2011. As part of the course requirements, students are asked to write a blog on a topic of their choice. Amazon.com Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) brings the Canadian legal debate over the patentability […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/","og_site_name":"IPOsgoode","article_published_time":"2011-11-22T16:27:33+00:00","author":"ccraig","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ccraig","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/"},"author":{"name":"ccraig","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#\/schema\/person\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94"},"headline":"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market","datePublished":"2011-11-22T16:27:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/"},"wordCount":730,"keywords":["Geoff Goodson"],"articleSection":["Innovation","Patentability","Patents","Patents Course Topic"],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/","url":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/","name":"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market - IPOsgoode","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-22T16:27:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#\/schema\/person\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2011\/11\/22\/businessasusualhowpatentsforbusinessmethodsmayneedlesslystiflethemarket\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cBusiness As Usual?\u201d How Patents For Business Methods May Needlessly Stifle The Market"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/","name":"IPOsgoode","description":"An Authoritive Leader in IP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#\/schema\/person\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94","name":"ccraig","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"ccraig"},"url":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/author\/ccraig\/"}]}},"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":280,"label":"Innovation"},{"value":141,"label":"Patentability"},{"value":10,"label":"Patents"},{"value":1140,"label":"Patents Course Topic"}],"post_tag":[{"value":1216,"label":"Geoff Goodson"}]},"featured_image_src_large":false,"author_info":{"display_name":"ccraig","author_link":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/author\/ccraig\/"},"comment_info":"","category_info":[{"term_id":280,"name":"Innovation","slug":"innovation","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":280,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":269,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":280,"category_count":269,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Innovation","category_nicename":"innovation","category_parent":0},{"term_id":141,"name":"Patentability","slug":"patentability","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":141,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":137,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":141,"category_count":137,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Patentability","category_nicename":"patentability","category_parent":0},{"term_id":10,"name":"Patents","slug":"patents","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":10,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":557,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":10,"category_count":557,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Patents","category_nicename":"patents","category_parent":0},{"term_id":1140,"name":"Patents Course Topic","slug":"patents-course-topic","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":1140,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":30,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":1140,"category_count":30,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Patents Course Topic","category_nicename":"patents-course-topic","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":[{"term_id":1216,"name":"Geoff Goodson","slug":"geoff-goodson","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":1216,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2140"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14724"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14724\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}