{"id":70,"date":"2007-11-13T17:24:33","date_gmt":"2007-11-13T21:24:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/dapina\/lw2970\/ip\/?p=85"},"modified":"2007-11-13T17:24:33","modified_gmt":"2007-11-13T21:24:33","slug":"85","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/","title":{"rendered":"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely."},"content":{"rendered":"

For many years, the gold standard in word processing has been Microsoft\u2019s Office software. Indeed, Microsoft Word is so entrenched as the word processing software of choice that its name has practically become synonymous with its function - as Kleenex has with facial tissue. But I.B.M., arguably Microsoft\u2019s biggest contender for computer-related supremacy, is gearing up to challenge Microsoft\u2019s dominance.<\/p>\n

On September 18, 2007, I.B.M. announced their new software, I.B.M. Lotus Symphony, at an event in New York. The program consists of Office-type software that is \"open-source\". Open-source technologies, which have been available from other companies for some time, allow a user to link their office software to other users. This means, according to the New York Times, that a doctor\u2019s office, for example, could create a document or a spreadsheet with a patient\u2019s medical information that could be automatically linked up and updated on that patient\u2019s hospital records, or in a specialist\u2019s office. This technology, as stated above, is not new. Microsoft has its own version. What is so groundbreaking about I.B.M.\u2019s version, however, is that it is free.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Clearly, this development is of some concern for Microsoft, whose version of the software can be quite costly. Just weeks before the I.B.M. version (which is backed by Google and Sun Microsystems) was announced, Microsoft attempted to have their program ratified by the International Organization for Standardization in Geneva as the technical standard, but failed. ISO standards<\/a> are put in place to facilitate the sharing of technological advances and to safeguard consumers. Unfortunately for Microsoft, I.B.M.\u2019s format was approved a year earlier as the international standard.<\/p>\n

Presumably, Microsoft was looking to have their standard ratified as a way of justifying the cost. While it is unlikely that I.B.M\u2019s software is going to replace the Microsoft Office Suite as the software of choice for consumers, it will absolutely have an impact. How could a software that works just as well, and indeed well enough to be certified as the technical standard, and is offered for free, not impact Microsoft\u2019s market share? A spokesperson for Microsoft hinted to the New York Times that the lack of compatibility with older Office documents will sufficiently limit the spread of I.B.M\u2019s product.<\/p>\n

I think Microsoft hit on a key point here. Consumers, especially those of us who are not technologically savvy, stick to what we know. I know that if I buy a new version of Office, I can open any document and I\u2019ve ever written and nothing will have changed. Even if it is only the formatting that could be altered by the new program, I know I wouldn\u2019t risk it. The question this raises for me however, is if I.B.M. can do it for free, why can\u2019t Microsoft?<\/p>\n

I think the answer is that they don\u2019t have to. The emotion that Microsoft is targeting by threatening non-compatibility is the reason they have the dominance in the first place - fear. There is so much fear in the marketplace around new technology for those who don\u2019t understand it. And I think that companies like Microsoft, record companies, cell phone companies and the like prey on this fear. Even I, with my limited technological knowledge, know that Microsoft Office can be easily transferred from one computer to another. And yet, when I bought my brand new laptop for law school, I wouldn\u2019t have dreamed of taking it from a family member\u2019s computer. I was so concerned with not having my Office software properly registered with Microsoft, that I paid the money to buy it. I don\u2019t even know what that registration means - has it provided me any security? Unlikely. But if I had it to do over again, would I still pay the $300 rather than getting it for free from either I.B.M. or a friend? Absolutely.<\/p>\n

Though I can freely admit that I\u2019ll still pay the money, the release of I.B.M.\u2019s software does make me wonder why I have to. I.B.M. isn\u2019t in the business of altruism. As questioned above, if it is financially viable to produce this kind of software and to freely distribute it, why can\u2019t Microsoft do that as well? As word processing becomes as common, or even more so, then taking pen to paper, shouldn\u2019t we be re-examining what we charge for access? No one would by a notebook for hundreds of dollars, and rightfully so - we know what it costs to produce it. And now we know the same for software - Viva La Revolution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

For many years, the gold standard in word processing has been Microsoft\u2019s Office software. Indeed, Microsoft Word is so entrenched as the word processing software of choice that its name has practically become synonymous with its function - as Kleenex has with facial tissue. But I.B.M., arguably Microsoft\u2019s biggest contender for computer-related supremacy, is gearing […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2140,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[200,124],"tags":[201],"class_list":["post-70","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-open-source","category-technology","tag-rebecca-fisch"],"yoast_head":"\nAn End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely. - IPOsgoode<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely. - IPOsgoode\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"For many years, the gold standard in word processing has been Microsoft\u2019s Office software. Indeed, Microsoft Word is so entrenched as the word processing software of choice that its name has practically become synonymous with its function - as Kleenex has with facial tissue. But I.B.M., arguably Microsoft\u2019s biggest contender for computer-related supremacy, is gearing […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IPOsgoode\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-11-13T21:24:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ccraig\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ccraig\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2007\\\/11\\\/13\\\/85\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2007\\\/11\\\/13\\\/85\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ccraig\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94\"},\"headline\":\"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely.\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-13T21:24:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2007\\\/11\\\/13\\\/85\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":801,\"keywords\":[\"Rebecca Fisch\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Open-Source\",\"Technology\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2007\\\/11\\\/13\\\/85\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2007\\\/11\\\/13\\\/85\\\/\",\"name\":\"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely. - IPOsgoode\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-13T21:24:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2007\\\/11\\\/13\\\/85\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2007\\\/11\\\/13\\\/85\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/2007\\\/11\\\/13\\\/85\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/\",\"name\":\"IPOsgoode\",\"description\":\"An Authoritive Leader in IP\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94\",\"name\":\"ccraig\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"ccraig\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.yorku.ca\\\/osgoode\\\/iposgoode\\\/author\\\/ccraig\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely. - IPOsgoode","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely. - IPOsgoode","og_description":"For many years, the gold standard in word processing has been Microsoft\u2019s Office software. Indeed, Microsoft Word is so entrenched as the word processing software of choice that its name has practically become synonymous with its function - as Kleenex has with facial tissue. But I.B.M., arguably Microsoft\u2019s biggest contender for computer-related supremacy, is gearing […]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/","og_site_name":"IPOsgoode","article_published_time":"2007-11-13T21:24:33+00:00","author":"ccraig","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ccraig","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/"},"author":{"name":"ccraig","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#\/schema\/person\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94"},"headline":"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely.","datePublished":"2007-11-13T21:24:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/"},"wordCount":801,"keywords":["Rebecca Fisch"],"articleSection":["Open-Source","Technology"],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/","url":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/","name":"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely. - IPOsgoode","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-11-13T21:24:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#\/schema\/person\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/2007\/11\/13\/85\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"An End To Microsoft\u2019s Dominance? Unlikely."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/","name":"IPOsgoode","description":"An Authoritive Leader in IP","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-CA"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/#\/schema\/person\/09b0ef7189d5a2bd6fef2472e5ea5b94","name":"ccraig","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-CA","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d6461ef50f637a66f0e694df440ca5896971e12de84d604936521b184fec22a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"ccraig"},"url":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/author\/ccraig\/"}]}},"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":200,"label":"Open-Source"},{"value":124,"label":"Technology"}],"post_tag":[{"value":201,"label":"Rebecca Fisch"}]},"featured_image_src_large":false,"author_info":{"display_name":"ccraig","author_link":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/author\/ccraig\/"},"comment_info":"","category_info":[{"term_id":200,"name":"Open-Source","slug":"open-source","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":200,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":21,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":200,"category_count":21,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Open-Source","category_nicename":"open-source","category_parent":0},{"term_id":124,"name":"Technology","slug":"technology","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":124,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":473,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":124,"category_count":473,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Technology","category_nicename":"technology","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":[{"term_id":201,"name":"Rebecca Fisch","slug":"rebecca-fisch","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":201,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":1,"filter":"raw"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2140"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yorku.ca\/osgoode\/iposgoode\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}