York Region District School Board v Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario: The Application of the Charter to Ontario School Boards

In York Region District School Board v Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario, 2024 SCC 22 [YRDSB], the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) reviewed an arbitrator’s decision regarding the reasonable expectation of privacy of two teachers at an Ontario public school. The majority conducted a correctness review to set aside the arbitrator’s decision, holding that the […]

APPEAL WATCH: Sentencing Specificity and Sexual Offences Against Children in R v Sheppard

The Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) has granted leave [41126] to appeal the Alberta Court of Appeal’s (“ABCA”) decision in R v Sheppard, 2023 ABCA 381 [Sheppard]. The case will join R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 [Friesen] and R v Bertrand Marchand, 2023 SCC 26 [Bertrand Marchand] as further guidance on sentencing offenders who […]

APPEAL WATCH: Lights, Camera, Action - Competition Tribunal applies drip pricing provision

In Canada (Commissioner of Competition) v Cineplex Inc., 2024 Comp Trib 5 [Cineplex], the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) levied penalties of nearly $40 million dollars against Cineplex Inc., finding that Cineplex Inc. made price misrepresentations through its digital ticket purchasing platforms. The decision marks the first contested proceeding involving the recently enacted “drip pricing” deceptive marketing […]

Parliament Doesn’t Make Mistakes: Clarifying Driving Prohibitions in R v Wolfe

In R v Wolfe, 2024 SCC 34 [Wolfe], a majority of the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) ruled that driving prohibitions cannot be imposed upon conviction for driving-related criminal negligence. The decision closes a years-long, multi-court debate over the statutory interpretation of new driving offence provisions in the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46 [Code].

Appeal Watch: R v Carignan - When can an Accused Rebut the Deemed Lawfulness of a Warrantless Arrest?

In R v Carignan [41186], the Supreme Court of Canada (“Supreme Court”) will — for the first time — interpret the scope of and relationship between ss 495(2) and 495(3) of the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46. Section 495 governs police powers to arrest without warrant. Subsections (2) and (3) of this provision have […]

President's Choice Bank v Canada : Credit Card Loyalty Point Programs Can Claim Input Tax Credits

Loyalty point programs demonstrate that, for GST/HST purposes, a payment can be received in its entirety as both a commercial and exempt amount. The Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) recently allowed an appeal brought by President’s Choice Bank (“PC Bank”) in President’s Choice Bank v Canada, 2024 FCA 135 [President’s Choice]. The decision permitted PC […]

APPEAL WATCH: Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia on torts in family law

In Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2023 ONCA 476 [Ahluwalia], the Ontario Court of Appeal (“ONCA”) granted a partial appeal and reduction of damage awards in the context of a family law proceeding. Significantly, it denied the creation of the novel tort of “family violence.” In doing so, it clarified the requirements for introducing tort claims in […]

Ultra Vires and Unreasonable: Federal Court rules on invocation of the Emergencies Act

In Canadian Frontline Nurses v Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 42 [CFN], the Federal Court (“FC”) considered an application for judicial review challenging the federal government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act, RSC 1985, c 22 in the wake of the 2022 Freedom Convoy protests. The FC granted the application, holding that the invocation of the […]

The Clashing of Constitutional Principles: Canada (Attorney General) v Power

In Canada (Attorney General) v Power 2024 SCC 26 [Power], the Supreme Court held that the Crown can be held liable in damages for passing legislation later deemed unconstitutional. This case turns on conflicting constitutional principles. On the one hand, the principles of parliamentary sovereignty, the separation of powers, and parliamentary privilege call for absolute […]

APPEAL WATCH: Mohawk Council of Kanesatake v. Sylvestre On The Right To Seize Band Property

The Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) is set to hear an appeal out of the Quebec Court of Appeal (“QCCA”) on where the prescription period for the creditor’s right to seize band property was interrupted by a notice of execution. The SCC will require the parties in Mohawk Council of Kanesatake v. Sylvestre, 2023 QCCA […]