ShakespeareXML Logo

Works Cited

Peter Paolucci, Ph.D. York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

[Back to "Re-Thinking the Electronic Edition of Shakespeare"]

	Aarseth, Espen J.. Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore: Johns 	
	Hopkins University Press, 1997. 

	Arthur, Ross. "F1 pics ++." Messages to Peter Paolucci. 11 Mar. 2009. E-mail.

	Barnard, David, et al. "Hierarchical Encoding of Text: Technical Problems and SGML 	
		Solutions."  Computers and the Humanities 29.3 (1995):  211-231.  	
		<> [DOI:10.1007/BF01830617]. 

	---.  "SGML-Based Markup for Literary Texts: Two Problems and Some Solutions" 	
		Computers and the Humanities 22.4 (1988). [DOI 10.1007/BF00118602]. 

	Best, Michael.  Scholarly Editions of Shakespeare for the Internet:  
		A Paper Written for the Seminar "The Shakespearean Texts in the Electronic Age" 
		at the International Shakespeare Association, Los Angeles, April 1996.  	

	Blayney, Peter. "The Publication of Playbooks." A New History of Early English Drama.  	
		Ed. J. D. Cox and D. S. Kastan. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.

	Burnard, Lou, et al. "Electronic Textual Editing: Editors' Introduction." Text Encoding 	
		Initiative Consortium.  <>.

	Cook, Hardy.  Valuing the Material text: A Plea for a Change in Policy Concerning 	
		Selection of Reference Texts for Future New Variorum Shakespeare Editions, with 	
		Examples from the 1609 Quarto if SHAKES-PEARES SONNETS. Proceedings of the 
		Shakesper Global Electronic Shakespeare Conference. 1994. 	

	Donaldson, Peter. "Digital Archive as Expanded Text: Shakespeare and Electronic Textuality."  	
		Electronic Text: Investigations in Method and Theory. Ed Kathryn Sutherland.  
		Oxford:	Clarendon Press, 1997. 173-97.

	Eskelinen, Markku.  Six Problems in Search of a Solution: The Challenge of Cybertext Theory
		and Ludology to Literary Theory.  	

	Galey, Alan.“Dizzying the Arithmetic of Memory: Shakespearean Source Documents as Text, 	
		Image, and Code.” Early Modern Literary Studies Special Issue 12 (January, 2004):

	Gordon, W. Terrence. Marshall McLuhan: Escape into Understanding. Toronto: Stoddart, 1997.

	Greg, W.W.. The Editorial Problem in Shakespeare: A Survey of the Foundations of Text.
		Oxford University Press, 1942. 

	Hinman, Charleton.  The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare. New York: W.W.
		Norton & Company, 1968. ("Introduction" ix-xxvii).

	Hockey, Susan M.  Electronic Texts in the Humanities: Principles and Practice. New York: 		
		Oxford University Press, 2000.

	Irace, Kathleen O.. Reforming the "Bad" Quartos: Performance and Provenance of Six 	
		Shakespearean Editions. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1994.

	Jowett, John. Shakespeare and Text. Oxford Shakespeare Topics. Oxford: Oxford 	
		University Press, 2007.

	Lavagnino, John and Elli Mylonas. "The Show Must Go On: Problems of Tagging Performance 	
		Texts." Computers and the Humanities 29.2 (March, 1995): 113-121. [DOI:10.1007/BF01830705].
	Mah, Carole, et al. "Some Problems of TEI Markup and Early Printed Books." Computers 	
		and the Humanities. 31:1 (January, 1997): 31-46. [DOI: 10.1023/A:1000464519769].

	Massai, Sonia. "Redefining the Role of the Editor for the Electronic Medium: A New 	
		Internet Shakespeare Edition of Edward III." Early Modern Literary Studies 9.3 / 	
		Special	Issue 12 (January, 2004): 5.1-10. 

	McLuhan, Marshall. The Official Site of Marshall McLuhan. <>.  

	McManus, Richard.   Berners-Lee Disses Web 2.0.  	

	MLA. The MLA's The Shakespeare Variorum Handbook: A Manual Of Editorial 	
		Practice and Guidelines for Editors of Scholarly Editions. 	

	Mueller, Martin.  Wordhoard: An Application For The Close Reading And Scholarly 	
		Analysis of Deeply Tagged Texts. <>.

	O'Reilly, Tim.  What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next 	
		Generation of Software. Web. 30 May 2009.	

	Shakespeare, William. The Arden Shakespeare Revised: Complete Works.  Eds. Richard 
		Proudfoot, Ann Thompson,  David Scott Kastan, and consultant editor Harold Jenkins.  
		London: Thompson Learning, 2005 (editorial material: 1998, 2001).

	Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare: Based on the Oxford Edition. Stephen 	
		Greenblatt et al Eds. Second edition, vols 1 and 2. New York: W.W. Norton, 2008.

	Shakespeare, William.  The Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works.  Stanley Wells et 	
		al. Eds. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005. 

	Shillingsburg, Peter L.  From Gutenberg to Google: Electronic Representations of 	
		Literary Texts. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 

	---.   Scholarly Editing in the Computer Age: Theory and Practice. 3rd edition. Ann Arbor: 	
		The University of Michigan Press, 1996 rpt. 1999.  

	Sperberg-McQueen, C.M. "Textual Criticism and the Text Coding Initiative."  The Literary 
		Text in the Digital Age. Ed., Richard Finneran. nn Arbor, Michigan: University of 
		Michigan Press, 1999, 37-61. 

	Tanselle, G. Thomas. "Critical Editions, Hypertexts and Genetic Criticism."  The 	
		Romanic Review (86) 1995.  	

	Wells, Stanley, Taylor, Gary, et al.. William Shakespeare, a Textual Companion. 
		Oxford and 	New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.

	TEI-C. TEI-C Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange version P5. Web. 30 May 2009. 	

	TEI-C.  20: Non-hierarchical Structures.  Web. 30 May 2009.

	University of Victoria.  Internet Shakespeare Editions. Web. 30 May 2009.							

	University of Virginia (e-texts).  The First Folio and Early Quartos of William Shakespeare.  	
		Web. 30 May 2009.<>. 

	Walker, Alice.  Textual Problems of the First Folio. "Shakespeare Problems," Wilson, Dover, 	
		Ed., vol. VII.  London: Cambridge University Press, 1953.

	Werstine, Paul. “Hypertext and Editorial Myth.” Early Modern Literary Studies 3.3. Special 	
		Issue 2 (January, 1998): 2.1-19.	

	Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany. Shakespeare Database Project. 
		Web. 30 May 2009.  <>.   

	Willoughby, Edwin Eliot. The Printing of the First Folio of Shakespeare. Great Britain: 	
		Bibliographic Society (Oxford University Press), 1932.

	(W3C) World Wide Web Consortium.  Meta Content Framework Using XML.  	

	(W3C) Word Wide Web Consortium. Mobile Web Initiative.  <>. 

	(W3C) Word Wide Web Consortium.   W3C XML Pointer, XML Base and XML Linking. 

	(W3C) Word Wide Web Consortium.   Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). 	

	(W3C) World Wide Web Consortium.  XML Pointer Language (XPointer) Version 1.0.