Home » 2012 (Page 8)

Genetic Testing Patents: USPTO Presents the 'Generic' Comments

The current system for genetic testing in America functions by having the patent holder of a particular genetic test control the testing process and results interpretation of that test. There is concern that, inherent in that current system, there is a lack of independent second opinion testing available - testing which has the potential to make […]

IP Osgoode Webpage Renovations for the New Semester

The IP Osgoode team has been hard at work this summer redesigning certain parts of our webpage to help improve reader experience and make our exciting projects more visible to you. The major changes include an Alumni Page to showcase all the volunteers that have helped support IP Osgoode, a Feedback Page to allow our […]

Avoiding Poison Apples and Tending to Blackberries: Did Canada’s 1989 Shift To First-To-File Nip Small-Time Innovation In the Bud?

New legal research from the University of Pennsylvania Law School suggests so. The aim of the study, according to Professors David S. Abrams and R. Polk Wagner, is to empirically predict how the recent changes to American patent laws, introduced by section 3 (s3) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), will affect American innovation after […]

UK IPO Endorses Streamlined Copyright Hub

In July the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) released a report on copyright licensing in the digital age. The report details the response of the UK Government to Professor Ian Hargreaves’ recommendation of a Digital Copyright Exchange (DCE).

Anticipating Another Successful Year For The IP Intensive Course

Last year’s inaugural offering of The Intellectual Property Law and Technology Intensive Program (IP Intensive) was a great success.  We are excited to be offering the IP Intensive again this year and are anticipating another successful year.