Home » Page 23

Posts

Hatred Under the Guise of Rationality: Disability, Eugenics, and Ward v Quebec

People with disabilities—as well as other marginalized peoples—are well-aware that ideas presented under the guise of neutrality, rationality, and scientific thought are not necessarily any less likely to propagate hate due to their manner of expression, contrary to the analysis recently provided by the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) in Ward v Quebec (Commission des […]

Implementing ‘Impact of Race and Culture Assessments’ in the Sentencing of Black Nova Scotian Offenders: R v Anderson

How should criminal courts account for the existence of systemic and pervasive anti-Black racism when sentencing Black offenders? This is the question that the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal (“NSCA”) grappled with in R v Anderson, 2021 NSCA 62 [Anderson]. More specifically, the appellate court examined how evidence from ‘Impact of Race and Culture Assessments’ […]

Charter Breaches and the Concept of “Fresh Start”: SCC Grants Leave in James Andrew Beaver v R and Brian John Lambert v R

When can courts admit evidence obtained following breaches of an accused’s rights and freedoms under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [Charter]? In R v Beaver, 2020 ABCA 203 [Beaver], the Court of Appeal of Alberta (“ABCA” or “Court of Appeal'') ruled that courts can admit such evidence if a proper “fresh start” occurred […]

Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia : Putting a Cost on Family Violence in Divorce Proceedings

Content Warning: this article has some descriptions of violence and abuse that may be triggering to some readers*  Justice Mandhane of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (“ONSC” ) has re-framed how family violence is addressed in divorce proceedings in the recent case of Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2022 ONSC 1303 [Ahluwalia]. Previously, survivors of family […]

Contemporaneousness of Sexual Consent in R v AE

Content Warning: This article includes depictions of sexual violence that may evoke strong emotions for some readers. The jurisprudence surrounding the requirement for consent as a defence for sexual assault has expanded substantially to dispel the stereotypes and myths associated with sexual assault, most recently refined in R v Barton, 2019 SCC 33 [Barton]. Despite this […]

Crown Immunity Trumps Police Officers’ Tarnished Reputations in Ontario (AG) v Clark

The Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) made important strides in determining the scope of immunity for Crown prosecutors when dealing with third party interests. In Ontario (Attorney General) v Clark, 2021 SCC 18 [Clark], the SCC faced the claims of three police officers who sought vindication after several Crown attorneys allowed unsubstantiated claims of police […]

Sanctuary from Drunk Driving Sanctions: SCC to hear appeal in R v McColman

Does private property provide a sanctuary for drunk drivers and prevent the police from conducting sobriety checks? This issue split the Court of Appeal for Ontario (“ONCA”) in R v McColman, 2021 ONCA 382 [McColman]. On 3 February 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) granted leave to hear the appeal. Background In March 2016, […]

Association de médiation familiale du Québec v. Bouvier : SCC Finds the Exception to Settlement Privilege Applies in the Family Mediation Context

Should conversations that take place during family mediation remain confidential? In Association de médiation familiale du Quebec v. Bouvier, 2021 SCC 54 [Association de mediation] the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC” or “the Court”) held that the exception to the general rule of settlement privilege can apply in the context of family mediation.  An exception […]

R. v. C.P.: s. 37(10) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act Deemed Constitutional

On May 7, 2021, the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC” or "the Court”) released the decision of R. v. C.P., 2021 SCC 19 [C.P.]. In the decision of C.P., the Court was tasked with ruling on the constitutionality of s. 37(10) of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, S.C. 2002, c.1 [YCJA]. Facts of the Case […]