The York University Shared Accountability and Resource Planning (SHARP) budget model, is a modified activity-based budget framework that focuses on the University’s core activities when establishing budgets. We start by identifying the key activities the university performs and assigns resources to these activities based on planned activity levels.
At York University, our core operating activities are categorized as: Academic, Research, and Shared Services (Student Services, Facilities, IT, and other Administration). We also have other ancillary activities which includes continuing studies, ancillary services (food services, bookstore, parking) and athletics & recreation.
Key components of the SHARP budget model
Revenue is attributed to the Faculty or unit that generates it using the same formula or simplified version through which the institution receives it. What cannot be attributed is allocated to the university fund (e.g. interest income).
Once attributed, faculties contribute to the university fund for strategic initiatives, contingency funds and tailored faculty support, and pay into shared service costs (e.g. Library, HR, Finance etc.) based on agreed upon cost drivers. An adjustment is also made for inter-Faculty teaching to create the net operating budget.
Revenues will be directed to the Faculties or Units that generate them. Inter-Faculty tuition and grant revenues for double-major and major-minor programs will be allocated to both Faculties. The total operating revenue received by the institution is categorized as follows:
University Shared Services are the central operations of the University such as the President’s and Provost’s offices, Finance, Facilities, IT, Student Services, and more. These central areas provide critical services to all Faculties, Researchers, Students and other administrative units. Total cost of all Shared Services at York University are measured against the guideline establishing that the total cost of shared services should be no greater than 30% of the University’s total revenues. In a period of declining revenue, this places pressure on shared services units to reduce total costs and optimize services.
Cost Attribution
Shared Services costs are attributed to each of the Faculties and Other revenue generating units through established cost drivers where cost drivers are established based on the principle of ‘Causality’ and ‘Benefits Received” while factoring in measurability and materiality in the selection of a cost driver.
Service Tiers (NEW)
In the most recent update of the model, Shared Services units can now create ‘Service Tiers’ which aim to allow Service units to offer customized services to Faculties or other revenue generating units who need something beyond the base level of services normally offered. The following Services Tier levels are available:
•Base (Bronze) – this is the base service of the unit. It represents the fixed cost or the lowest common denominator. All Faculties and Other Revenue Generating units pay for base level shared services. This level is mandatory.
•Silver – this is a premium level 1 and specific services included in this tier are outlined by the shared service unit. Costs to opt into this tier will be calculated by the total cost to provide these services above the base costs and allocated according to established cost drivers. Costs are shared across each of the Faculties opting into this tier.
•Gold – this is a higher premium level of service contemplated by some shared service units. Similar to the silver level, specific services included in this tier are outlined by the shared service unit. Costs to opt into this tier will be calculated by the total cost to provide these services above the base costs and silver tier costs and allocated based on the established cost drivers. Costs are shared across each of the Faculties opting into this tier.
The University fund is supported by revenues contributed from Ancillary services, School of Continuing Studies, Each faculty, and unallocated sources (such as interest income). These funds are then used to support institutional strategic initiatives, collaboration and manage institutional risks. The University Fund Council advises the President on the allocation of funds from the University Fund.
The inter-faculty adjustment is an adjustment to a home faculty’s revenue to reflect the value of teaching provided by another faculty. For Tuition and Grant revenue, 40 percent of the average Arts and Science rate is directed to the teaching faculty, while 60 percent is retained by the home faculty under the current methodology. This methodology is under review.
