
Award Details:
*$10K/yr, up to 4 years
Application Deadline: February 1, 2026, 11:59PM EDT
* $3,333.33/term (FA/WI/SR) that the student is registered full-time in.
As per CFREF rules, these funds cannot be used to replace any existing university funding mechanism, they must be used as top-up.

To be eligible to apply:
- We are only accepting applicants who plan to start their PhD program at York or Queen's University within 12 months of the application deadline or who have started their PhD program at either York or Queen's no earlier than January 1, 2025.
- All applications must be supported by a Connected Minds Member who will serve as the applicant’s primary supervisor. (A primary supervisor may support a maximum of 2 PhD applicants per competition except in the case of Indigenous (First Nations, Metis, and Inuit) trainees where there are no restrictions on the number.)
- All applications must be supported by another Connected Minds Member who will serve as a co-supervisor from a different area of study (i.e., different Connected Minds pillar) to enhance interdisciplinary expertise for the proposed project. (This does not have to be an official co-supervisor in the student’s graduate program, but could be).
- Applicants must have a project proposal that is aligned with the Connected Minds mandate and long-term goals.
- Students cannot hold multiple CFREF funded graduate scholarships at the same time.
*Not including career interruptions. An opportunity to describe any career interruptions will be provided in the application portal.
For Awardees:
- Total award value is up to $40,000 ($3,333.33/term (FA/WI/SR) that the awardee is actively registered in for 4-years).
- Awardees must be registered in a full-time academic PhD program at the institution where the award is held within 12-months of the application deadline.
- Awardees must maintain full-time registration status in their PhD program throughout the award period to remain eligible for continued funding.
- Awardees must maintain residence in Ontario and be within commuting distance of either York University or Queen’s University to ensure active engagement in program activities, including in-person events, meetings and training opportunities.
- Required to complete progress reports when requested, including the program’s on-line progress report at the end of each fiscal year (starting with the fiscal year that funding was received).
- Expected to present their progress/results at the Connected Minds annual retreats.
- Expected to participate in Connected Minds biennial academic conferences, annual retreats, and workshops on technical, academic, and applied themes.
- Required to participate in a research exchange at a partner organization or internship in a different sector or with a community partner (maximum duration of 3-months). Funding up to $10,000 will be provided by Connected Minds for eligible travel related expenses. Trainees must submit a Research Exchange/Internship travel (REIT) allowance request form prior to travel.
- Strongly encouraged to apply for external scholarships.
- Encouraged to work with Innovation York or Queen's Office of Partnership and Innovation to consider any commercialization or entrepreneurial opportunities.
- Required to acknowledge Connected Minds/CFREF funding in publications, presentations, conference materials, and professional communications as follows: “this work was undertaken thanks in part to funding from the Connected Minds program, supported by Canada First Research Excellence Fund, grant #CFREF-2022-00010.”
- Encouraged to join the Connected Minds alumni group upon departure from the program, and keep connected to the program for career development, networking opportunities, knowledge mobilization, and community engagement.
Accountability of Supervisory Team:
- All Connected Minds members involved in the supervisory team for funded trainees are required to complete the program’s on-line progress report at the end of each fiscal year (starting with the fiscal year that funding was received).
- The supervisory team must provide the resources and support required to enable their trainee to complete the proposed project successfully.
- The primary supervisor must ensure that their trainee meets all requirements for holding a Connected Minds scholarship and remains accountable during the tenure of their award.
The full application must be submitted through the link posted above by 11:59PM EDT on Sunday, February 1, 2026.
All responses must be written in clear, lay language suitable for an interdisciplinary review committee. Please avoid technical jargon. Where specialized concepts are necessary, ensure that they are fully explained so that reviewers from diverse backgrounds can easily understand.
A. Project Description: (1,000 words max)
Detail the proposed project's objectives, relationship to the goals of Connected Minds, interdisciplinary approach, co-creation with partners and communities, knowledge mobilization (KMb) strategies, and expected outcomes/impact. (Use the below headings):
- Project Aims and Objectives: Explain the issue your project addresses and why it matters. Describe the overarching goal of your project and the specific research objectives.
. - Alignment with Connected Minds: Explain how your project aligns with one or more of Connected Minds’ long term goals.
- Goal 1: Understand how the interplay of humans and intelligent technologies produces unexpected, emergent properties at the community/whole society levels.
- How does your project examine human–intelligent technology interactions and emergent patterns, behaviours, or systemic effects.
- How does your project examine human–intelligent technology interactions and emergent patterns, behaviours, or systemic effects.
- Goal 2: Predict how new intelligent technologies will disrupt the techno-social collective.
- Describe how the project is structured to generate predictions; the technologies or systems involved in your project; what tools or methods will be used to derive them, and how these predictions will contribute to understanding of techno-social disruption and the development of responsible interventions.
- Describe how the project is structured to generate predictions; the technologies or systems involved in your project; what tools or methods will be used to derive them, and how these predictions will contribute to understanding of techno-social disruption and the development of responsible interventions.
- Goal 3: Use these predictions to drive new research and intelligent technology development.
- Explain how this project will design and develop new and responsible intelligent technology, policy, design, or community practice.
.
- Explain how this project will design and develop new and responsible intelligent technology, policy, design, or community practice.
- Goal 1: Understand how the interplay of humans and intelligent technologies produces unexpected, emergent properties at the community/whole society levels.
- Methodological and Interdisciplinary Approach: Provide a clear description of the research/project design. Including data collection and analysis plans, tools, techniques, and technologies involved (if applicable). Describe the interdisciplinary nature of your proposed work; the degree to which the proposed project incorporates methods and/or outputs across two or more CM expertise pillars (neuroscience & behaviour, intelligent technologies, society). Why are the chosen methods appropriate and are there any anticipated challenges or mitigation strategies.
. - Co-Creation and Partnership Approach: Describe how co-creation is built into your project. Consider:
- Who you will collaborate or co-create with (community groups, industry, policy agencies, clinical partners, Indigenous communities, etc.) and how they will be engaged.
- How reciprocal benefit, inclusiveness, non-extractive practices, and community voice are embedded in your approach.
- If co-creation is not yet integrated, describe how you plan to incorporate it and what support you may need.
.
- Knowledge Mobilization (KMb) and Expected Impact: Explain how the project outcomes will be shared and applied. Consider:
- Who will benefit from your findings.
- How your work may influence communities, policies, technologies, or societal systems.
- Planned KMb activities (e.g., workshops, co-creation meetings, prototypes, plain-language materials, datasets, policy briefs, community events).
B. Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion Considerations: (150 words max per question)
Explain how EDI principles and best practices will be applied in the development of the proposal’s design, implementation, and impact by answering the following:
- Please describe how individuals from underrepresented groups (women; racialized; Black; Indigenous Peoples; Persons with disabilities; 2SLGBTQIA+) and/or their perspectives and experiences (e.g., from literature, consultations), have been meaningfully integrated in the creation of the project’s question(s), design, methodology, and knowledge translation plan. If this has not yet occurred, please explain how underrepresented perspective will be integrated in your program.
- To help you engage and build knowledge of EDI and co-creation practices during your time in the program, what learning and developmental resources and programs would you be interested in participating in to develop your EDI knowledge and skillset. For example, information about conferences, seminars, and/or working groups.
- In recognition of barriers to participation and data sovereignty, what measures are in place to avoid or mitigate harm to underrepresented groups participating in research? What measures are in place to ensure knowledge generation and translation process have positive impact on underrepresented communities?
- What steps are in place to ensure the research is open to diverse viewpoints and ensure design and methodology are non-extractive?
C. Uploads to the Application Form:
- References/Works Cited: If applicable, 1 page max.
- Tables, Figures, Project Timeline: Optional, 2 pages max. Please note that any additional pages beyond two may be deleted prior to review.
- Letter of Support (using the template provided): A signed letter of support from both the proposed supervisor and the co-supervisor, detailing:
- The scholarly ability of the student and the reasons you chose to accept them as a trainee;
- Commitments to the student and how they plan to guide discussions on career options and pathways aligning with the student's interest and skills;
- Description of the different pillars each supervisor's & co-supervisor's research profile represent, ensuring a transdisciplinary training experience and demonstrating sufficient expertise and resources to support the project.
- Transcript: provide a copy of your transcript.
- Curriculum Vitae: provide a copy of your most recent CV.
D. Additional Requirements:
- One letter of recommendation (using the template provided): Note that the letter of recommendation should come from a referee that is NOT the Connected Minds member who is providing the letter of support and should be emailed directly from the referee to applyconnectedminds@yorku.ca.
- Self-identification survey: All applicants are required to complete the self-identification survey. If you do not feel comfortable self-identifying, selecting the option “I prefer not to self-identify” under question #5, will end the survey. This option is also available throughout the survey, providing you with autonomy on what is shared. For more information on how data from the self-identification survey will be used, please click here.
Please note: We appreciate the interest and effort of all applicants across our funding opportunities. Due to the high volume of applications and in order to maintain a fair and efficient review process, we are unable to provide individual feedback or respond to inquiries regarding selection outcomes. All decisions are final, and we are not able to accommodate requests for reconsideration.
Process:
- Connected Minds staff will pre-screen applications to ensure that they meet the basic criteria described above.
- Any project addressing Indigeneity will be further reviewed by the Indigenous Advisory Circle. In keeping with principles of self-determination, the Circle has the right to veto projects related to Indigenous research.
- Members of the Training Committee will independently evaluate each application*. Scores will be weighted based on the criteria below.
- Once all applications are scored, the average for each application will be calculated and assigned an initial rank by the Connected Minds admin team.
- The Training Committee will meet to discuss the scores and strengths/weaknesses of the applications.
- Applications deemed fundable will go through the FIRE-UP process for final determination of priority funding order.
- The total number of scholarships awarded will be based on budget availability.
In recognition of the underrepresentation of Black and Indigenous Peoples within these fields, at least 10% of available scholarships will be designated for qualified applicants identifying as African, Caribbean, and Black, and at least 10% for Indigenous Peoples (First Nations, Metis, and Inuit), totaling at least 20% of scholarships. To qualify for these designated awards, applicants must complete the voluntary self-identification form and meet the minimum requirements set for the award.
Additionally, if you belong to one of the other underrepresented groups (racialized individuals; persons with disabilities; women and 2SLGBTQIA+), self identification will be used as a tiebreaker for candidates who are deemed equal. The tie breaker situation is directly linked to thresholds the Connected Minds program seeks to achieve based on our Affirmative Action targets.
*Conflicts of interest will be declared. Committee members will not evaluate or discuss applications in which they appear as a supervisor, co-supervisor, or collaborator. If necessary, guest evaluators will be recruited to replace their expertise.
Leadership Review and Approval:
- Recommendations on which applicants to fund based on the above processes will be presented to the Connected Minds Leadership Committee for review and final approval.
- Results will be communicated approximately 8-10 weeks after the submission deadline.
Triage Stage:
The following will be discussed for each application at the evaluation meeting:
- Basic Requirements: The application must meet the basic requirements described above.
- Alignment with Connected Minds: Does the proposal fall within the Connected Minds mandate and long-term goals?
- EDI Statement: Have the principles of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion described above been satisfied in the EDI section?
If these criteria are not met, the proposal will be rejected outright. If they are met, the following criteria will be judged:
Weighted Criteria for Full Evaluation:
- Scholarly Ability or Potential of the Candidate (based on all submitted materials 30%)
- Quality of any contributions to scholarly activities.
- Relevance of academic training and/or work/lived experience to the program and project.
- Scholarships and awards held.
- Ability to think critically and apply skills and knowledge.
- Initiative and autonomy.
- Determination and ability to complete projects within an appropriate period of time.
- Excellence of Proposal (30%)
- Is sufficient background provided to understand the project?
- Is the idea and/or approach novel and innovative?
- Is the general methodological approach appropriate.
- Are the expected outcomes clearly defined and realistic?
- Commitment of Supervisory Team (based on letter of support from supervisors 20%)
- Indication of the supervisors' commitment to providing support and mentorship aligning with the student's interests and skills.
- Clear indication and description of the different pillars each of the supervisor's & co-supervisor's research profile represent, ensuring a transdisciplinary training experience.
- Appropriate resources are explicitly identified to support both the trainee and the proposed project.
- Overall Program Evaluation (based on all submitted materials, 20%)
- Interdisciplinarity: The degree to which the proposed project incorporates methods and/or outputs across the three CM expertise pillars (neuroscience & behaviour, intelligent technology, society).
- Co-creation focus: Are external partners necessary and involved in planning the project? In the case of community-based or applied projects, were end-users/communities consulted (or a plan for how such engagement and consultation will take place)?
- Potential impact on knowledge mobilization and translation; for new research approaches, technologies, health, policy, or commercial application.
- Overall contribution to the Connected Minds mandate and training goals.
Last updated: 12/09/2025

