Skip to main content Skip to local navigation
Home » Artificial Intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning

Are you wondering how generative AI, like ChatGPT, will affect teaching and learning in higher education? We have collected some resources, in a variety of formats, together in one place as a starting point.

Did you know York's Vice-Provost of Teaching and Learning has their own page? - Generative AI in Teaching and Learning, which includes a wealth of real-world examples, practical advice, and up-to date resources for students and faculty, with a separate section for graduate studies. You will also find a page to support our community in ethical discussions around AI, and a page on the basics of AI, GenAI 101.

If you are looking for professional development opportunities related to artificial intelligence (AI) in teaching and learning, check out a list of events from our website calendar.

SHARE Framework © 2024 by Robin Sutherland-Harris is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

The SHARE framework for scholarly co-writing with AI aims to integrate generative AI into the academic writing process. This approach is designed to help students and educators navigate the complexities of authorship, cognitive offloading, and the ethical use of AI in scholarly work. SHARE provides a step-by-step strategy for scholarly co-writing with AI, adaptable to various levels of AI involvement and different assessments. For more information about key concepts and scholarship that inform this framework, as well as a list of references, you can download this .pdf.

Following the creation of a draft text, either by the human author(s) alone or by having AI respond to a prompt or prompts, SHARE proposes a series of writing/editing stages that preserve human authorial integrity. Each stage can be conducted by the human author alone or in conversation with AI.

Streamline

Objective: Remove redundancies, repetitions, and unnecessary words or phrases to make the text more concise and clear.

Application: Identify and eliminate any superfluous content that does not add value to the argument or narrative.

Heighten

Objective: Identify and fill gaps in the content, such as missing scope, content, or counterarguments.

Application: Enhance the text by adding necessary information, expanding on key points, and addressing any overlooked aspects.

Arrange

Objective: Revise the order of paragraphs and sections to ensure logical flow and coherence.

Application: Reorganize the text to improve the structure and ensure that the argumentation progresses naturally and effectively.

Ratify

Objective: Fact-check and ensure the AI-generated content aligns with the author’s intentions and claims.

Application: Verify the accuracy of the information, correct any errors, and ensure that the content reflects the author’s perspective and objectives.

Evidence

Objective: Incorporate evidence, citations, and other elements to build credibility and trust.

Application: Add relevant data, references, and citations to support the claims made in the text and enhance its scholarly value.

Flexibility: The framework can be adapted for individual or group work, short or long assignments, and varying levels of AI involvement.

Scaffolding: Steps can be integrated into multiple class sessions, focusing on different aspects of the framework, and various elements of academic writing, revising, and editing.

Critical Framework: SHARE can be used to critically analyze AI-generated texts, fostering deeper discussions about content and writing practices.

Quick Tips:

  • Start small: pilot just one stage in a low-stakes task.
  • Log everything: saving prompt transcripts makes Ratify easier and can help ease academic integrity concerns.
  • Rotate labor: alternate human-first and AI-first versions to show contrasts.
  • Leverage discipline-specific tools (e.g., CAD plug-ins, Zotero, chemical-structure generators) to embed SHARE naturally.

First-Year Writing “Micro-Draft Clinics”

First-year composition / gen‑ed writing • 100‑student lecture + tutorials • Blended • AI attitude: cautious but curious

SHARE StageConcrete ActivityPedagogical Pay-off
StreamlineTA live-demos ChatGPT trimming a student volunteer’s paragraph; everyone tests on one sentence of their own draft.Immediate model of concision without outsourcing whole text.
HeightenHomework: students prompt AI for missing counter-arguments or stronger transitions.Teaches rhetorical completeness.
ArrangeIn tutorial, peer pairs drag-and-drop paragraphs in Padlet to check logical flow.Visualizes structure; prevents AI-generated disorder.
RatifyStudents highlight two AI-suggested facts & post a source-check note in LMS.Builds fact-checking habits.
EvidenceLibrarian mini-workshop on Zotero; final draft must include AI-disclosure footnote.Normalizes transparent citation and AI use.

Biology Lab‑Report “Evidence Stations”

2nd‑year biology lab • 32‑seat in‑person lab • AI attitude: skeptical

SHARE StageConcrete ActivityPedagogical Pay‑off
StreamlineStation 1: AI suggests concise wording for Results.Shows editing without altering data integrity.
HeightenStation 2: prompt AI for overlooked controls or statistical qualifiers.Strengthens experimental rigour.
ArrangeStation 3: teams reorder Methods–Results–Discussion for narrative clarity.Reinforces scientific storytelling.
RatifyStation 4: benchmates cross‑check AI claims against raw data sheets.Embeds data‑first verification.
EvidenceFinal station auto‑imports verified citations (e.g., ISO enzyme standards).Ensures traceable, discipline‑specific referencing.

Business Capstone “Client Memo Sprint”

Final‑year consulting project • 6 groups of 5 • Hybrid • AI attitude: enthusiastic

SHARE StageConcrete ActivityPedagogical Pay‑off
StreamlineAI condenses memo draft into a one‑page executive summary.Mirrors real client expectations.
HeightenTeams prompt AI for missing cost‑benefit angles or stakeholder impacts.Broadens analytical scope.
ArrangeReorder content to match client template in Google Docs.Teaches professional formatting.
Ratify15‑min “hallucination hunt”: locate & correct at least one AI error.Instils critical AI literacy.
EvidenceEmbed spreadsheets & market data; memo ends with AI‑assistance disclosure.Demonstrates transparent, data‑driven recommendations.

Humanities Seminar “Dialogic Close‑Reading Essay”

Upper‑level literature • 12‑student seminar • Face‑to‑face • AI attitude: highly skeptical

SHARE StageConcrete ActivityPedagogical Pay‑off
StreamlineStudents present AI‑compressed vs. original paragraph; discuss nuance loss.Reveals when AI oversimplifies literary analysis.
HeightenManually add deeper textual evidence and secondary‑source dialogue.Centers human interpretation.
ArrangeInstructor‑guided exercise reorders body paragraphs into a thematic arc.Strengthens argumentative coherence.
RatifyQuote‑check each AI paraphrase against primary text; annotate discrepancies.Safeguards against misquotation.
EvidenceMLA citations plus brief AI‑usage note in end‑matter.Retains scholarly rigour and transparency.

Online Graduate Research‑Methods “Annotated Lit‑Review Pathway”

Master’s • 25‑student asynchronous online • AI attitude: mixed

SHARE StageConcrete ActivityPedagogical Pay‑off
StreamlineWeek 1: AI trims a bloated summary; students critique what was lost/gained.Develops precision and reflection.
HeightenWeek 2: prompt AI for missing theoretical lenses or under‑represented populations.Promotes inclusive scholarship.
ArrangeWeek 3: reorder sources in Miro to create thematic clusters.Visualises literature architecture.
RatifyWeek 4: peers verify two citations each, marking errors in Hypothes.is.Cultivates communal fact‑checking culture.
EvidenceWeek 5: Zotero builds bibliography; appendix uploads AI prompt log.Reinforces citation accuracy & AI disclosure.

These use-cases were created with the partial assistance of ChatGPT o3.

Featured resource

Aschaiek, S. (2023, Summer). A bot aced my homework: How ChatGPT is impacting the academic experience. The York University Magazine. https://magazine.yorku.ca/issues/summer-2023/a-bot-aced-my-homework/

Read the article!

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) - A 3-page document, part of the Teaching Commons food for thought series, that gives an overview of generative AI, and links to a variety of resources.

Aschaiek, S. (2023, Summer). A bot aced my homework: How ChatGPT is impacting the academic experience. The York University Magazine. https://magazine.yorku.ca/issues/summer-2023/a-bot-aced-my-homework/

Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146.locale=en

Syed, Imran. (2023, September). Embracing AI in the Classroom (Part One) and (Part Two). Teaching Commons Blog. https://www.yorku.ca/teachingcommons/2023/09/14/blog-240/

Totten, T. (2023, September). From Obstacle to Opportunity: Reinventing Assignments in the Age of Generative AI. Teaching Commons Blog. https://www.yorku.ca/teachingcommons/2023/09/14/blog-239/

Ward, A. (2023, January 26). How will AI tools such as ChatGPT shape teaching and learning? YFile. https://yfile.news.yorku.ca/2023/01/26/how-will-ai-tools-such-as-chatgpt-shape-teaching-and-learning/

Access may be restricted to the York community, so if you are prompted to sign in, select "Sign in with SSO". Enter “yorku” in the company domain, then you will then be able to access the recording by using your PPY username and password.

Practical AI series:

York University Summit on Generative AI in Higher Education: Faculty Showcase

Session: Artificial intelligence and academic integrity

SHARE Framework

Are you interested in using or adapting the SHARE framework in your teaching? We would love to hear from you! We are currently launching a SoTL project that explores faculty use of this framework across a variety of teaching contexts. Contact Robin Sutherland-Harris for more information.

Community of Practice: Generative AI Pedagogies at York

This community of practice is dedicated to uniting York University educators who share an interest in generative AI. Together, we connect, collaborate, and share resources, exploring best practices and addressing the challenges and opportunities we face in responding to this technology into postsecondary education. Our community of practice accepts new members at any time, and all who teach at York are welcome.

Learn more and join!

a group surrounding a computer to illustrate the community of practice connects in-person and online.